2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.11.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous HPLC–UV analysis of rufinamide, zonisamide, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine monohydroxy derivative and felbamate in deproteinized plasma of patients with epilepsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is currently insufficient data to define a general therapeutic range for rufinamide [39]. Rufinamide serum or plasma concentrations can be determined by HPLC [145]. Monitoring of serum levels can be especially helpful in patients taking concomitant liver enzyme inducers or who are receiving hemodialysis.…”
Section: Rufinamidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is currently insufficient data to define a general therapeutic range for rufinamide [39]. Rufinamide serum or plasma concentrations can be determined by HPLC [145]. Monitoring of serum levels can be especially helpful in patients taking concomitant liver enzyme inducers or who are receiving hemodialysis.…”
Section: Rufinamidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of PHPLA, PHPAA and PHPA were mainly carried out by HPLC methods, such as HPLC-UV [20,21], HPLC with fluorescence detection (FLD) [22][23][24] and HPLC-MS [25][26][27]. Among them, the sensitivity of UV method is low, therefore the UV method is not suitable for the determination of trace amount of tyrosine metabolites in urine; MS method is sensitive, but the MS equipment is expensive [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, a number of analytical methods for the monitoring of antiepileptic drugs in biological samples such as HPLC with UV detection , evaporative light‐scattering detection , fluorescence polarization immunoassay , and enzyme‐multiplied immunoassay technique have been reported but many suffer from disadvantages such as relatively long analytical run time, large sample volumes, and complex sample preparation. Various LC–MS‐based methods for one or several antiepileptic drugs have been developed and used in clinical laboratories but limited by the monitoring numbers of antiepileptic drugs or long run time which is not suitable for high‐throughput analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%