Although the diagnosis of Gitelman syndrome (GS) and Bartter syndrome (BS) is now feasible by genetic analysis, implementation of genetic testing for these disorders is still hampered by several difficulties, including large gene dimensions, lack of hot-spot mutations, heavy workup time, and costs. This study evaluated in a cohort of patients with genetically proven GS or BS diagnostic sensibility and specificity of a diuretic test with oral hydrochlorothiazide (HCT test). Forty-one patients with GS (22 adults, aged 25 to 57; 19 children-adolescents, aged 7 to 17) and seven patients with BS (five type I, two type III) were studied; three patients with "pseudo-BS" from surreptitious diuretic intake (two patients) or vomiting (one patient) were also included. HCT test consisted of the administration of 50 mg of HCT orally (1 mg/kg in children-adolescents) and measurement of the maximal diuretic-induced increase over basal in the subsequent 3 h of chloride fractional clearance. All but three patients with GS but no patients with BS and pseudo-BS showed blunted (<2.3%) response to HCT; patients with BS and the two patients with pseudo-BS from diuretic intake had increased response to HCT. No overlap existed between patients with GS and both patients with BS and pseudo-BS. The response to HCT test is blunted in patients with GS but not in patients with BS or nongenetic hypokalemia. In patients with the highly selected phenotype of normotensive hypokalemic alkalosis, abnormal HCT test allows prediction with a very high sensitivity and specificity of the Gitelman genotype and may avoid genotyping. M utations of several genes that are involved in Na/ fluid reabsorption along the distal nephron are the cause of tubular disorders that are characterized by chronic hypokalemic alkalosis and normotensive, hyperreninemic hyperaldosteronism, including Gitelman syndrome (GS; OMIM 263800) and Bartter syndrome (BS) types I to V (1-3) (OMIM 241200, 601678, 607364, 602522, and 601199). Chronic normotensive hypokalemia and alkalosis may also be acquired as a result of known or unknown diuretic use, anorexia/bulimia, and laxative abuse (4 -6). Clinical history and biochemical workup may not allow definite diagnosis, especially concerning the different types of tubular disorders. Genetic diagnosis is now feasible for all known genes that are responsible for GS and BS, but in everyday practice, it remains not easily available for the clinician and, for the geneticist, costly, cumbersome, and time-consuming as a result of the great dimension of most genes, lack of hot-spot mutations, and the very large number of mutations described. Furthermore, in approximately 40% of patients with GS, only a single heterozygous mutation in the SLC12A3 gene is detected (7), so further examination of a second gene is usually necessary.Tests with diuretics have been used in the past to diagnose tubular disorders (8 -12) and nontubular conditions (5); however, genetic confirmation of the supposed diagnosis was rarely, if ever, available. We present the di...