2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) under low temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the control group, the richness of Propionivibrio, Geobacter, Pseudaeromonas, Aeromonas, and Tolumonas increased significantly after 7, 14, and 21 days. A recent study showed that, at low temperatures, Propionivibrio was a key member of the bacterial community that simultaneously removed nitrogen and phosphorus [36]. erefore, we also boldly predict that Propionivibrio plays an important role in the degradation of black-odor water; however, this hypothesis needs further verification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Compared with the control group, the richness of Propionivibrio, Geobacter, Pseudaeromonas, Aeromonas, and Tolumonas increased significantly after 7, 14, and 21 days. A recent study showed that, at low temperatures, Propionivibrio was a key member of the bacterial community that simultaneously removed nitrogen and phosphorus [36]. erefore, we also boldly predict that Propionivibrio plays an important role in the degradation of black-odor water; however, this hypothesis needs further verification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Nevertheless, in the system with SDS and SDBS, the nitrate nitrogen content increased significantly during the reaction and nitrification and denitrification enhancement [29]. It was indicated that nitrification and denitrification have a great influence on the denitrification efficiency of the system [30][31][32]. The comparison of Figure 1a,d showed that that the concentration of NO 3 − -N is the highest, while the removal rate of NH 4 + -N is the lowest, in the presence of SDS.…”
Section: Removal Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On the other hand, under low atmospheric pressure (72 kPa), the TIN removal rate of the H1 system in stage I (COD = 300 mg/L) and in stage II (COD = 200 mg/L) was 81.22% and 72.84%, respectively, both higher than that occurring in the L1 system under normal pressure. It may show that, although the DO content from the air into the water in the aerobic aeration stage was reduced, the SND often occurred efficiently under low oxygen pressure [35], thus the TIN removal rate was higher under lower atmospheric pressure. Similarly, under lower atmospheric pressure, the COD consumed by the external denitrification in H1 (COD dn ) was 8.36 mg/L and 13.30 mg/L, respectively, corresponding to the COD at 300 mg/L and 200 mg/L, which accounted for 9.39% and 31.89% of COD ana , Compared with that of L1, the amount of COD dn decreased.…”
Section: Effects Of Cod Concentrations On Organic Matter Removal In a Sndpr System Under Different Atmospheric Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%