1990
DOI: 10.2172/7178285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous NO sub x /SO sub 2 removal by the dry injection of lime-urea hydrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their cost is still quite high, and in the case of CMA an excessive amount of inert material must be transported together with the active part of the sorbent. On the other hand, satisfactory results have been found during the injection at high temperatures of calcium hydroxides modi fied with several additives for sulfur removal at oxidizing conditions ( ). To test if it was possible to prepare a cheap sorbent or to improve the sulfur removal capacity of the worst natural sorbents without excessive cost, some calcium hydroxides modified with several additives were prepared following the method above detailed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, their cost is still quite high, and in the case of CMA an excessive amount of inert material must be transported together with the active part of the sorbent. On the other hand, satisfactory results have been found during the injection at high temperatures of calcium hydroxides modi fied with several additives for sulfur removal at oxidizing conditions ( ). To test if it was possible to prepare a cheap sorbent or to improve the sulfur removal capacity of the worst natural sorbents without excessive cost, some calcium hydroxides modified with several additives were prepared following the method above detailed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third possibility consists of the use of modified sorbents. Calcium hydroxides modified with some additives, as for example calcium lignosulfonate, have been satisfactorily tested in boiler injection for sulfur retention applications at oxidizing conditions ( ). The amount of additive in the modified sorbent is very low, under 5 wt % in all cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%