2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6043-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous optimization of surface roughness and material removal rate for turning of X20Cr13 stainless steel

Abstract: International audienceThe objective of this article is to manufacture low-cost, high-quality products with maximum productivity in short time. In this work, four stages are considered: statistical investigation of the experimental results based on ANOVA, modelling based on regression analysis and mono- and multi-objective optimizations. In the first stage, turning experiments were carried out using an orthogonal array (L16) of Taguchi. Effects of cutting parameters on surface roughness and material removal rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
28
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
28
3
Order By: Relevance
“…ANOVA results for arithmetic mean Ra are illustrated in Table 4, which indicates that feed and nose radius are the significant as well as dominant factors affecting Ra as their P value is less than 0.05 and larger F-value. This is in good agreement with previously published work (Bouzid et al 2014b;Meddour et al 2015;Nouioua et al 2017). Insert nose radius has the most important significant influence on surface finish and its contribution is 44.59%.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis On Surface Roughnesssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…ANOVA results for arithmetic mean Ra are illustrated in Table 4, which indicates that feed and nose radius are the significant as well as dominant factors affecting Ra as their P value is less than 0.05 and larger F-value. This is in good agreement with previously published work (Bouzid et al 2014b;Meddour et al 2015;Nouioua et al 2017). Insert nose radius has the most important significant influence on surface finish and its contribution is 44.59%.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis On Surface Roughnesssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The rest of terms do not represent any significant effects on MRR. The same order of significant effect of machining parameters on the MRR was found by Bouzid et al (2014) when turning of X20Cr13 stainless steel. …”
Section: Analysis Of Variance (Anova)supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Bouzid et al (2014) optimized cutting parameters for determining the minimum surface roughness (Ra) which corresponds to the maximum material removal rate (MRR) in turning of X20Cr13 steel with mono and multi-objective optimizations based on the L16 OA of Taguchi. Taguchi's signal-to-noise ratio was used to accomplish the objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response surface methodology (RSM) (Bouzid et al, 2014a;Aouici et al, 2014;Hessainia et al, 2015;Bhaumik & Maity, 2017;Nayak et al, 2017) is both a statistical and a mathematical technique that is useful for modeling and analyzing problems in which responses can be affected by several variables.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of this parameter is important: the goal is to manufacture low cost, high quality products in short time (Fnides et al, 2013;Bouzid et al, 2014a). The value of Material Removed Rate was calculated by the following Eq.…”
Section: Analysis Of Variance (Anova) For Mrrmentioning
confidence: 99%