2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous real-time estimation of maximum substrate uptake capacity and yield coefficient in induced microbial cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we estimate uptake rates during production based on experimental data. As uptake can be significantly reduced during production [39] this avoids possible overfeeding in the predicted optimum. In the case study, we observe a reduced uptake rate, but uptake is not a limiting factor for optimization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we estimate uptake rates during production based on experimental data. As uptake can be significantly reduced during production [39] this avoids possible overfeeding in the predicted optimum. In the case study, we observe a reduced uptake rate, but uptake is not a limiting factor for optimization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State observers (soft sensors) are widely used to estimate nonobserved process state variables from available measurements (Soroush, 1997). The first implementation of the Kalman Filter (KF) (Chui & Chen, 2017; Kalman, 1960) was later extended to Particle Filters (Chen et al, 2004; del Moral, 1996), which are arguably the most commonly applied observers in bioprocess engineering (Krämer et al, 2020; Müller et al, 2023; Neddermeyer et al, 2016; Sinner et al, 2022). While initially designed for linear systems, numerous alternatives have been proposed to the general KF approach (Kalman, 1960) to better capture nonlinearities in the system, for example, the derivative‐free unscented KF (Julier et al, 1995), and the more generalized central differences KF (Ito & Xiong, 2000; Nørgaard et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%