1969
DOI: 10.1107/s0567739469001525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous reflections and the mosaic spread in a crystal plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
2

Year Published

1974
1974
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is clearly demonstrated in Fig. 1, which shows (a) a complete 0 scan for the weak 200 reflection and (b) the corresponding simulation of (a) using the computer programs UM WEG of Prager (1971) (for peak positions) and MDDSCRM of Stevenson (1983) [which provides an approximate intensity calculation and uses the polarization corrections of Caticha-Ellis (1969)]. In an attempt to avoid multiple-diffraction effects, every reflection was measured at six different azimuthal positions (0 and 0+ 180 ° for 0=0 and +_1 °) and the outlying pair of measurements discarded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is clearly demonstrated in Fig. 1, which shows (a) a complete 0 scan for the weak 200 reflection and (b) the corresponding simulation of (a) using the computer programs UM WEG of Prager (1971) (for peak positions) and MDDSCRM of Stevenson (1983) [which provides an approximate intensity calculation and uses the polarization corrections of Caticha-Ellis (1969)]. In an attempt to avoid multiple-diffraction effects, every reflection was measured at six different azimuthal positions (0 and 0+ 180 ° for 0=0 and +_1 °) and the outlying pair of measurements discarded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MD events assuming either ideally imperfect or highly perfect crystals have been studied by several authors, namely Chang (1984), Caticha-Ellis (1969), Moon & Shull (1964), Colella (1974) and Pinsker (1977). In the ideally imperfect crystal, small perfect regions (mosaic blocks) diffract according to the kinematical theory and the diffracted beams are the sum of incoherent intensities scattered by several mosaic blocks.…”
Section: Mosaic Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, other blocks are under Bragg condition for the 21 reflection and thus enhance the beam 1 intensity. According to Caticha-Ellis (1969), the peak profile in a three-beam case is better defined when the 01 reflection is forbidden by the crystal space group or is very weak in comparison with 02 and 21 reflections. Then, assuming an isotropic Gausian distribution of block misorientation, the peak profile for a mosaic crystal will be given by the following expression:…”
Section: Mosaic Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The profile of these peaks is the convolution of the diffraction condition for the secondary and coupling reflections. According to Caticha-Ellis (1969), the profile of a BSD peak in a three-beam case is better defined when the 01 reflection is forbidden by the crystal space group or is very weak in comparison with the 02 and 21 reflections. When a BSD with a forbidden or very weak Bragg reflection is chosen, the diffraction regime (dynamical, kinematical or mixed) depends on the perfect region dimension (block) parallel to the crystal surface (Morelhã o & Cardoso, 1996).…”
Section: X-ray Multiple Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%