2008
DOI: 10.1243/09576509jpe355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous removal of CO2, SO2, and NOx from flue gas by liquid phase dehumidification at cryogenic temperatures and low pressure

Abstract: Abstract:The current paper presents a new process for postcombustion carbon capture. An historical survey of the cryogenic techniques used in the chemical industry for the removal of acid vapours is given, with particular emphasis on two Ryan -Holmes-based processes. The paper suggests that these two processes have the potential to achieve CO 2 separation from flue gas with high second law efficiency. A further variation on these processes is then proposed enabling the simultaneous capture of CO 2 , SO 2 , and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researches on the chemical absorption method for CO 2 generated from power plants and steelmaking plants were carried out using liquid absorbant. [3][4][5][6][7] Other methods such as absorption, 8,9) adsorption, [10][11][12] the membrane method using a polymer film [13][14][15] or molecular sieve, 16,17) and cryogenic distillation method 18) have also been reported. However, a disadvantage of these methods is that large equipment and much energy are required in order to capture a large amount of CO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researches on the chemical absorption method for CO 2 generated from power plants and steelmaking plants were carried out using liquid absorbant. [3][4][5][6][7] Other methods such as absorption, 8,9) adsorption, [10][11][12] the membrane method using a polymer film [13][14][15] or molecular sieve, 16,17) and cryogenic distillation method 18) have also been reported. However, a disadvantage of these methods is that large equipment and much energy are required in order to capture a large amount of CO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%