2015
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2015.987543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous removal of nutrients from milking parlor wastewater using an AO2sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system

Abstract: The feasibility of using a lab-scale, anaerobic-aerobic-anoxic-aerobic sequencing batch reactor ((AO)2 SBR) to simultaneously remove biological organics, nitrogen and phosphorus from dairy milking parlor wastewater was investigated in this study. Three hydraulic retention times (HRT = 2.1, 2.7, and 3.5 days) and three mixing-to-process time ratios (TM/TP = 0.43, 0.57, and 0.68) were evaluated as two controlling factors using a 3 × 3 experimental design to determine the optimal combination. Results showed that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An AO 2 -SBR system was used to treat wastewater from a milk-parlor operation at different HRTs (2.1, 2.7, and 3.5 days) at three mixing-to-processing time ratios (0.43, 0.57 and 0.68), using a 3x3 factorial design (controlling two factors) to evaluate the optimal combination (Wu and Zhu, 2015). Results showed that the best results were obtained at an HRT of 2.7 days with a mixing-to-processing time ratio of 0.57 for an influent SCOD of 2000 mg/L.…”
Section: The Composition Of the Organic Fraction Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An AO 2 -SBR system was used to treat wastewater from a milk-parlor operation at different HRTs (2.1, 2.7, and 3.5 days) at three mixing-to-processing time ratios (0.43, 0.57 and 0.68), using a 3x3 factorial design (controlling two factors) to evaluate the optimal combination (Wu and Zhu, 2015). Results showed that the best results were obtained at an HRT of 2.7 days with a mixing-to-processing time ratio of 0.57 for an influent SCOD of 2000 mg/L.…”
Section: The Composition Of the Organic Fraction Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ilking parlors produce several types of waste as the sewage with solid waste (faeces, food remains and mud) and liquids (water, urine, milk remains and cleaning solutions for milking equipment), which IntroductIon M are a consequence of milking (Charlón, 2009). The wastewater from the milking parlor is rich in nutrients, such as protein, fat and lactose, originating from wasted milk, which contributes to organic matter, phosphorous and nitrogen present in liquid waste, bringing about contamination problems due to the high values of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) or chemical oxygen demand (COD), in addition to representing a source of harmful bacteria, such as the coliforms (Kern, Idler & Carlow, 2000;Shah & Patel, 2013;Wu & Zhu, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%