2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous removal of selenite and heavy metals from wastewater and their recovery as nanoparticles using an inverse fluidized bed bioreactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2022) 16 and Mal et al (2017), 17 respectively. In addition, the electron transport system activity (ETSA) was detected according to a previously reported method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2022) 16 and Mal et al (2017), 17 respectively. In addition, the electron transport system activity (ETSA) was detected according to a previously reported method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For Se 0 and Te 0 measurements, the pellets were washed with 1 M NaCl three times to remove Se( iv )/Te( iv ) and then treated with sonication (30 s sonication, 30 s pause, 30 min) in an ice bath; after that, the pellet was centrifuged (6000 rpm, 8 min), the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was washed twice with 10 mL of NaCl (1 M), resuspended in 1 mL of Na 2 S (1 M, red solution for Se 0 measurement) or 1 mL of KOH (1 M, black solution for Te 0 measurement), and finally determined at 500 nm and 340 nm. 9 Se( iv ) and Te( iv ) concentrations were measured at 500 nm and 340 nm following the methods described by Arindam et al (2022) 16 and Mal et al (2017), 17 respectively. In addition, the electron transport system activity (ETSA) was detected according to a previously reported method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current industrial efforts for selenium removal are mainly based on biological and chemical approaches, whereas physical methods (e.g., nanofiltration and reverse osmosis) have not captured much attention from industries due to the operational and maintenance costs (Ali and Shrivastava, 2021). Some advanced bioreactors, such as inverse fluidized bed bioreactors, granular sludge reactors, and hybrid bioreactors, displayed excellent Se-reducing bacterial activities, followed by the moderate recovery efficiency of selenium nanoparticles in a single-stage system (Cordoba and Staicu, 2018;Sinharoy and Lens, 2020;Sinharoy et al, 2022). Nevertheless, high sensitivity to variations in feed components and long operating periods of bioremediation unfavorably hinder its practical applications (Gingerich et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%