2022
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10511832.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous rupture propagation through fault bifurcation of the 2021 Mw7.4 Maduo earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xu & Zhang, 2023). Wei et al (2022) argue for sustained subshear speed of the entire rupture from back-projection and multiple point source inversion, which is in line with the joint geodetic and teleseismic inversion of Chen et al (2022). Our geodetically constrained dynamic rupture simulations indicate energetic nucleation and eastward unilateral, cascading supershear rupture speeds with a double transition from sub-to supershear speeds that would complicate observational inferences.…”
Section: Unilateral Supershear and Cascading Dynamic Rupturesupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Xu & Zhang, 2023). Wei et al (2022) argue for sustained subshear speed of the entire rupture from back-projection and multiple point source inversion, which is in line with the joint geodetic and teleseismic inversion of Chen et al (2022). Our geodetically constrained dynamic rupture simulations indicate energetic nucleation and eastward unilateral, cascading supershear rupture speeds with a double transition from sub-to supershear speeds that would complicate observational inferences.…”
Section: Unilateral Supershear and Cascading Dynamic Rupturesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The rupture speed inferred for the eastward-propagating front falls in the range of 3-5 km/s (Yue et al, 2022;Q. Li et al, 2022) whereas the westward propagation is inferred as 2.5-2.8 km/s (Chen et al, 2022;Wei et al, 2022). However, the mechanical relationship between potential supershear rupture episodes and regional tectonics remains highly debated, partially due to the nonuniqueness of the results from various data-driven and physics-based models Yue et al, 2022;Wei et al, 2022;Fan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2021 Mw7.4 Maduo earthquake ruptured bilaterally and with a strike-slip left-lateral mechanism the Jiangcuo fault, located within the Bayan Har block of the Eastern Tibetan plateau (e.g., Fan et al, 2022;L. He et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2022;Wei et al, 2022). This earthquake generated a 160-km long surface rupture, which has been widely characterized using several geodetic (e.g., Fan et al, 2022;K.…”
Section: Study Site and Available Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This earthquake generated a 160-km long surface rupture, which has been widely characterized using several geodetic (e.g., Fan et al, 2022;K. He et al, 2021;Jin and Fialko, 2021;Liu et al, 2021;Tong et al, 2022;Xiong et al, 2022;Yang et al, 2022;Zhao et al, 2021), field (Pan et al, 2022;Ren et al, 2022Ren et al, , 2021Xie et al, 2022;Yuan et al, 2022) and seismic data (e.g., Wei et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022). Field data report sparse surface ruptures with up to 2.6-2.9 m of horizontal displacement detected locally along primary fault strands (Pan et al, 2022;Ren et al, 2022Ren et al, , 2021Xie et al, 2022;Yuan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Study Site and Available Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%