2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2019.8759255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Super-Resolution and Segmentation Using a Generative Adversarial Network: Application to Neonatal Brain MRI

Abstract: The analysis of clinical neonatal brain MRI remains challenging due to low anisotropic resolution of the data. In most pipelines, images are first re-sampled using interpolation or single image super-resolution techniques and then segmented using (semi-)automated approaches. Image reconstruction and segmentation are then performed separately. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end generative adversarial network for simultaneous high-resolution reconstruction and segmentation of brain MRI data. This joint appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have further investigated CNNbased architectures for image SR. Among others, the following features have been reported to improve SR performance: an increased depth of the network (Kim et al 2016a), residual block (with batch normalization and skip connection) (Ledig et al 2017), sub-pixel layer (Shi et al 2016), perceptual loss function (instead of mean squared error-based cost functions) (Johnson et al 2016;Ledig et al 2017;Zhao et al 2017), recurrent networks (Kim et al 2016b), generative adversarial networks (Ledig et al 2017;Pham et al 2019). Very recently, Chen et al (2018) proposed a 3D version of densely connected networks (Huang et al 2017) for brain MRI SR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have further investigated CNNbased architectures for image SR. Among others, the following features have been reported to improve SR performance: an increased depth of the network (Kim et al 2016a), residual block (with batch normalization and skip connection) (Ledig et al 2017), sub-pixel layer (Shi et al 2016), perceptual loss function (instead of mean squared error-based cost functions) (Johnson et al 2016;Ledig et al 2017;Zhao et al 2017), recurrent networks (Kim et al 2016b), generative adversarial networks (Ledig et al 2017;Pham et al 2019). Very recently, Chen et al (2018) proposed a 3D version of densely connected networks (Huang et al 2017) for brain MRI SR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison With Supervised Super-Resolution Methods: Supervised deep-learning super-resolution methods developed by [41,57] were evaluated on a subset of 20 neonatal brain MRIs from the dHCP dataset. Table III lists results as reported by [41] together with quantitative evaluation of our proposed approach on the same dataset (see Section VI-B1). Although methods of [41,57] used high-resolution groundtruth data for model training their results can be used to put results reported in this work into perspective.…”
Section: ) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the experiments, three publicly available MRI datasets were used: cardiac cine MRI from the MICCAI 2017 Automated Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge (ACDC) ( [38]); neonatal brain MRI of the developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) ( [39]) and adult brain MRI from the OASIS project ( [40]). Evaluation on neonatal and adult brain MRI enabled performance comparison with related unsupervised [28,29] and supervised [41] super-resolution methods. Finally, to demonstrate that our model is invariant to MRI scanners and voxel intensity distributions, we apply a model trained on cardiac MRI scans from the ACDC dataset to cardiac MRIs of the Sunnybrook dataset [42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we propose a GAN-based approach, called SegSRGAN, which generates not only a perceptual super-resolved image, but also a segmentation map (cortical, in our application case) from a single lowresolution MR image. This article, which is an extended and improved version of the conference paper [34], is organized as fol-lows. In Section 2, we describe the formulation of the super-resolution and segmentation image problem we aim to tackle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%