2007
DOI: 10.1038/nbt1345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous targeting of multiple disease mediators by a dual-variable-domain immunoglobulin

Abstract: For complex diseases in which multiple mediators contribute to overall disease pathogenesis by distinct or redundant mechanisms, simultaneous blockade of multiple targets may yield better therapeutic efficacy than inhibition of a single target. However, developing two separate monoclonal antibodies for clinical use as combination therapy is impractical, owing to regulatory hurdles and cost. Multi-specific, antibody-based molecules have been investigated; however, their therapeutic use has been hampered by poor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
266
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
266
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Bispecific agents, such as dual variable‐domain immunoglobulins (DVD‐Ig) 17, could theoretically deliver higher local concentrations with lower systemic exposure. In this format, the variable domains of 2 distinct monoclonal antibodies are linked, creating a tetravalent, dual‐targeting single agent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bispecific agents, such as dual variable‐domain immunoglobulins (DVD‐Ig) 17, could theoretically deliver higher local concentrations with lower systemic exposure. In this format, the variable domains of 2 distinct monoclonal antibodies are linked, creating a tetravalent, dual‐targeting single agent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). 23 However, some DVD-Igs show a positional effect; thus, they maintain antigenaffinity at the level of the parental antibody only at the outer, N-terminal Fv (Fv1). Antigen affinity at the inner Fv (Fv2) is significantly reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Bispecific molecules described thus far can be divided into five classes based on their molecular format: 1) BsAb with IgG1-like structure, which are monovalent for each antigen; 2) BsAb prepared by appending binding domains to the IgG, which are bivalent for each antigen; 3) BsAb prepared using antibody fragments, which are monovalent for each antigen and often lack the Fc region; 4) bispecific fusion proteins, which are formed of an antibody fragment genetically linked to a protein to add additional functionality or specificity; and 5) bispecific conjugates, which are prepared by chemical conjugation of antibody fragments. While some such bispecific molecules have demonstrated manufacturing robustness, in vivo drug-like properties, suitable pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy have been achieved, platforms that yield multifunctional bispecific antibodies with different spatial configurations and flexibility suitable for a variety of target and disease applications are still needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%