2010
DOI: 10.1177/097152151001700210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sindhu Phadke, Women’s Status in North-Eastern India. New Delhi: Decent Books. 2008. 477 pages. Rs 1100

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two original models of ‘coordinated market economies’ (CMEs; as proposed for the Germany and Japan) and ‘liberal market economies’ (LMEs; as proposed for US and Great Britain) have recently been complemented by a third model of ‘dependent market economies’ (DMEs) (for economies in East Central Europe, see Nölke and Vliegenthart, 2009) 5 and models of state-led market economies (Boyer, 2005; Schmidt, 2009). We thus contribute to a CC/BRICs research programme that is currently burgeoning, not only in the OECD world, but also within emerging countries such as Brazil, India and South Africa (Becker, 2013a; Boschi and Santana, 2012; Bresser-Pereira, 2012; Condé and Delgado, 2009; Ebenau, 2012; Kennedy, 2011; Mazumdar, 2010; Musacchio and Lazzarini, 2012; Padayachee, 2013; Schmalz and Ebenau, 2012; Schneider, 2013; Witt and Redding, 2014; see also the special issue of DMS — Der Moderne Staat on state capitalism in large emerging countries (Ten Brink and Nölke, 2013)). In the context of this debate, our approach to the CC field integrates the VoC framework but goes beyond its LME–CME dichotomy (Amable, 2003; Coates, 2005; Jackson and Deeg, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two original models of ‘coordinated market economies’ (CMEs; as proposed for the Germany and Japan) and ‘liberal market economies’ (LMEs; as proposed for US and Great Britain) have recently been complemented by a third model of ‘dependent market economies’ (DMEs) (for economies in East Central Europe, see Nölke and Vliegenthart, 2009) 5 and models of state-led market economies (Boyer, 2005; Schmidt, 2009). We thus contribute to a CC/BRICs research programme that is currently burgeoning, not only in the OECD world, but also within emerging countries such as Brazil, India and South Africa (Becker, 2013a; Boschi and Santana, 2012; Bresser-Pereira, 2012; Condé and Delgado, 2009; Ebenau, 2012; Kennedy, 2011; Mazumdar, 2010; Musacchio and Lazzarini, 2012; Padayachee, 2013; Schmalz and Ebenau, 2012; Schneider, 2013; Witt and Redding, 2014; see also the special issue of DMS — Der Moderne Staat on state capitalism in large emerging countries (Ten Brink and Nölke, 2013)). In the context of this debate, our approach to the CC field integrates the VoC framework but goes beyond its LME–CME dichotomy (Amable, 2003; Coates, 2005; Jackson and Deeg, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wages for women home-based workers are extremely low (All India Democratic Women’s Association (AIDWA), 2009; Lerche et al, 2017). Studies on women workers in the garment sector have pointed out, women’s paid work, particularly as home-based workers, gets subsumed or framed within the norms of domestic labor (AIDWA, 2009; Mazumdar, 2007; Mies, 2012 [1982]). As Mazumdar (2007) and Mezzadri and Srivastava (2015) also note in their studies, women who worked in garment factories were assigned low-skill tasks such as thread cutting, checking, or packing of finished products as tasks that were better remunerated remained reserved for men.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Informal Employment and Gender Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…straddled both the worlds and called WS ‘the intellectual arm of the women’s movement’. For her, production of a counter ideology was as much part of a struggle for change as critiquing social science concepts, theories and methods (Mazumdar, 2012, pp. xi–xv ).…”
Section: The Emergence Of Women’s Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%