2002
DOI: 10.4324/9780203471807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singapore Politics Under the People's Action Party

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
109
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
109
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the PAP professed a rejection of Western-style liberal democracy, it has, since its inception, accepted the need for some welfare spending and pragmatic economic intervention. Mauzy and Milne (2002) discern four major underlying principles of the PAP: pragmatism, meritocracy, multiracialism and communitarianism.…”
Section: Crisis Management In a 'Moderated Democracy'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the PAP professed a rejection of Western-style liberal democracy, it has, since its inception, accepted the need for some welfare spending and pragmatic economic intervention. Mauzy and Milne (2002) discern four major underlying principles of the PAP: pragmatism, meritocracy, multiracialism and communitarianism.…”
Section: Crisis Management In a 'Moderated Democracy'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore issues and problems that are related to race and procommunist opinions or activities are considered sensitive and should be handled carefully. Since communication can be used to "bring about national cohesion" or to "widen social cleavages" [17], in Singapore, the media have been turned into "depoliticized" entities [18]. It has become the one whose main function is to "inform, educate and entertain Singaporeans for the purpose of communitarian national building", and to "stay away from sensitive political issues" [19].…”
Section: Politics and Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rude subcultural life in Singapore was as much about a shared collective identity and having fun as it was about developing "solutions" to the problems of dealing with a dominating educational system. Our subcultural lives had relatively little to do with class-based marginalization as such; it was more about racial and ethnic-based classifications, and most importantly about our desire for individuality in a culture that is notably conservative in terms of how young people are raised and taught (Englehart 2000;Mauzy and Milne 2002).…”
Section: Relevant Issues For Jauharimentioning
confidence: 99%