2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2010.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single administration of di(n-butyl) phthalate delays spermatogenesis in prepubertal rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the majority of published studies exclusively focused on EDCs exposure during gestation, as conditions associated with testicular dysgenesis syndrome are considered to initiate from aberrancies during fetal development. Other studies revealed that prepubertal rats exposed to phthalates at 0.4–2.2 g/kg/day exhibited altered seminiferous epithelium and delayed spermatogenesis ( 41 , 42 ); however no changes in AGD were reported in the previous reports, even with the highest dose of DEHP and its combination with GEN. In the current study, there was no significant alternation in AGD and adjusted AGD among the different treatment groups; a potential explanation is that the effects of DEHP, single exposure or in combination with GEN, were age-specific in this species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, the majority of published studies exclusively focused on EDCs exposure during gestation, as conditions associated with testicular dysgenesis syndrome are considered to initiate from aberrancies during fetal development. Other studies revealed that prepubertal rats exposed to phthalates at 0.4–2.2 g/kg/day exhibited altered seminiferous epithelium and delayed spermatogenesis ( 41 , 42 ); however no changes in AGD were reported in the previous reports, even with the highest dose of DEHP and its combination with GEN. In the current study, there was no significant alternation in AGD and adjusted AGD among the different treatment groups; a potential explanation is that the effects of DEHP, single exposure or in combination with GEN, were age-specific in this species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In one study of six girls, no effect of phthalate exposure during infancy on puberty was reported (Rais-Bahrami et al, 2004). However, as exposure was remote to the time of puberty assessment and animal studies have shown that the effects of phthalates are reversible (Alam et al, 2010; Boekelheide et al, 2009; Oishi 1985; Saffarini et al, 2012), any potential effect of phthalate exposure may have been missed. Other studies of puberty in girls yielded conflicting results.…”
Section: Epidemiological Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vacuolations (appearance of empty spaces in the seminiferous tubules), that appear in our testis section are smiler to vacuolation singe that found in the studies of Ahmed et al (25) and where evaluate the effect of nanoparticles on testes of adult albino rats and they indicate of presence intracellular vacuolations in Sertoli and Leydig cells which are a spermatogenic cells., Vacuolation are considered as the first morphological sign of testicular injury. The presence of vacuoles in the cytoplasm of the Sertoli cell denoted direct damage to this cell and reflected its early response to injury as indicated by Alam et al (26) , Nashwa et al (27) . This vacuolation was explained as a result of the autophagosomes created during the phagocytosis of necrotic germ cells by Sertoli cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%