2001
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.75.7.3363-3370.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Amino Acid Substitution in the V Protein of Simian Virus 5 Differentiates Its Ability To Block Interferon Signaling in Human and Murine Cells

Abstract: (2,8,16,38), although they achieve this by distinct mechanisms (40). Thus, for example, we have shown that simian virus 5 (SV5) blocks IFN signaling by targeting STAT1, an essential component of IFN-␣/␤ and IFN-␥ signaling cascades, for proteasome-mediated degradation (3). However, the ability of SV5 to block IFN signaling is species dependent. Thus, wild-type (wt) SV5 blocks IFN signaling in human, monkey, and canine cells but fails to block IFN signaling in murine cells. Indeed, the ability to block IFN sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
81
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, IFN antagonism has been implicated as a key factor in host and tissue specificity, with PIV5 showing limited host range dependent on the capacity of the V protein to bind to STAT2 from different species [129][130][131][132] , whereas NiV V blocks IFN signalling in cells of many species, consistent with its broad infectious range [82,110,124,126] . Tissue-specific antagonism of IFN has also been reported for NiV, which induces an IFN response in endothelial but not neuronal cells, correlating with differential subcellular localisation of NiV W [133] .…”
Section: Different Mechanisms Of Immune Evasion: Evolution or Experimmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Importantly, IFN antagonism has been implicated as a key factor in host and tissue specificity, with PIV5 showing limited host range dependent on the capacity of the V protein to bind to STAT2 from different species [129][130][131][132] , whereas NiV V blocks IFN signalling in cells of many species, consistent with its broad infectious range [82,110,124,126] . Tissue-specific antagonism of IFN has also been reported for NiV, which induces an IFN response in endothelial but not neuronal cells, correlating with differential subcellular localisation of NiV W [133] .…”
Section: Different Mechanisms Of Immune Evasion: Evolution or Experimmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As an IFN response modifier, the V protein is a virulence and pathogenesis-determining factor. In the case of SV5, species-specific restriction of STAT1 degradation has been shown to be a determinant of host species tropism, restricting SV5 replication in IFN-competent murine cells (20,31).…”
Section: The V Proteins Of Nipah Virus and Hendra Virus Have Been Demmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an IFN response modifier, the V protein is a virulence and pathogenesis-determining factor. In the case of SV5, species-specific restriction of STAT1 degradation has been shown to be a determinant of host species tropism, restricting SV5 replication in IFN-competent murine cells (20,31).A new genus of recently emerged paramyxoviruses, Henipavirus, was demonstrated to share V-dependent IFN signaling evasion properties with other paramyxoviruses (21,24,25). Encoded by a polycistronic gene, the 405-amino-acid V protein N terminus is shared with the co-amino-terminal P and W proteins (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, ectopic expression of SV5 V inhibits the activation of IRF-3 and NF-B by both dsRNA and infection with SV5V⌬C (10,11). Unlike the targeted degradation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), which requires both the N-and C-terminal domains of V (14,15), only the cysteine-rich C-terminal domain of V is required to inhibit dsRNA activation of the IFN-␤ promoter (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%