1991
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.65.6.3022-3028.1991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single amino acid substitutions in the hemagglutinin can alter the host range and receptor binding properties of H1 strains of influenza A virus

Abstract: We have previously characterized an influenza A (HlNl) virus which has host-dependent growth and receptor binding properties and have shown that a mutation which removes an oligosaccharide from the tip of the hemagglutinin (HA) by changing Asn-129 to Asp permits this virus to grow to high titer in MDBK cells. (C. M. Deom, A. J. Caton, and I. T. Schulze, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:3771-3775, 1986). We have now isolated monoclonal antibodies specific for the mutant HA and have used escape mutants to identify … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained with another pair of H1 variants, where acquisition of a carbohydrate side chain at almost the same site caused a shift in receptor specificity from binding to ␣-2,6-linked neuraminic acid to binding to ␣-2,3linked neuraminic acid. In the latter case, the altered glycosylation pattern was also accompanied by a change in host range (1). In light of these observations, our study supports the concept that by modulating receptor specificity and receptor avidity, glycosylation near the receptor binding site may be an important determinant for cell tropism and host range.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Similar results were obtained with another pair of H1 variants, where acquisition of a carbohydrate side chain at almost the same site caused a shift in receptor specificity from binding to ␣-2,6-linked neuraminic acid to binding to ␣-2,3linked neuraminic acid. In the latter case, the altered glycosylation pattern was also accompanied by a change in host range (1). In light of these observations, our study supports the concept that by modulating receptor specificity and receptor avidity, glycosylation near the receptor binding site may be an important determinant for cell tropism and host range.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The consistency of negative pleiotropy among the mutations in our collection contrasts with the mixed results of previous studies of host range expansion in which individual mutations were approximately equally likely to exhibit positive and negative pleiotropy (Aytay and Schulze 1991;Subbarao et al 1993;Shioda et al 1994;Couderc et al 1996;Llmas-Saiz et al 1996;Kobasa et al 1999;Hanley et al 2003). We suspect that the high frequency of negative pleiotropy among mutations that expanded host range in f6 resulted in part because the proximate mechanism underlying host range expansion was an increase in the rate of attachment to the novel host.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Consistent with this idea, laboratory experiments suggest that viruses shift hosts by experiencing an intermediate broad‐host‐range genotype, rather than instantaneously shifting from one host range to another, nonoverlapping host range. Thus, the vast majority of identified host‐range mutations are shown to expand the host breadth of a virus, instead of causing an immediate host‐shift (e.g., Zarling et al 1977; Aytay and Schulze 1991). Extensive evidence from animal, plant, and bacterial viruses shows that these broad host‐range viruses readily lose host range when allowed to adapt to a single host (e.g., reviewed in Fenner and Cairns 1959; Reddy and Black 1974; Marchette et al 1990; Wichman et al 1999; Crill et al 2000; Ebert 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%