2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single and double developing lines improve ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization in obese patients: A randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the included studies has compared first-attempt success rates between single and double-developing lines and did not find any significant difference. 16 In addition, pooling RRs from studies that have reported first-attempt success rates using single or double acoustic lines were no different. However, this needs to be tested in a setting where inexperienced physicians are undertaking this procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the included studies has compared first-attempt success rates between single and double-developing lines and did not find any significant difference. 16 In addition, pooling RRs from studies that have reported first-attempt success rates using single or double acoustic lines were no different. However, this needs to be tested in a setting where inexperienced physicians are undertaking this procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inexperienced physicians performed the procedure in 2 of the studies while experienced physicians inserted the cannulas in the other 4 studies. 13 , 14 , 16 18 Four out of the 6 trials used metal-containing strands from the X-ray detectable gauge to create acoustic shadow, while the other two trials used sutures. 13 18 Table 1 presents the characteristics of all the included studies.…”
Section: R Esultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, difficulties encountered during radial cannulation leading to conversion into femoral access were similarly shown to be associated with reduced patient height and body surface area [ 18 , 19 ]. This is somewhat surprising since radial catheterization is usually thought to be particularly challenging in obese patients [ 20 ]. However, it was demonstrated that radial artery diameter is increased in obese patients compared with lean subjects, which possibly explains our finding that difficult cannulation was associated with reduced body mass index [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%