2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2016.03.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single- and double-slit collimating effects on fast-atom diffraction spectra

Abstract: Appendix: Complex degree of coherence for an atomic beam passing through a collimating aperture Here we extend the Van Cittert-Zernike theorem [12] to evaluate the complex degree of coherence for two points

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such integrations, the random − → R os values are derived from a Gaussian distribution covering an area S equal to 2 or 3 reduced unit cells, while the Ω o values are obtained from a Gaussian distribution encompassing an angular region determined by the Heisenberg uncertainty relation. In this aspect, it should be mentioned that the − → R os and Ω o distributions are in principle defined by the profile of a coherent wave packet associated with the impinging particle, which depends on the collimation of the incident beam [30,32,33]. Here we have considered standard sizes of the − → R os and Ω o distributions because reported experimental data [5,8,[22][23][24][25] lack information about collimating parameters.…”
Section: A Scattering Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such integrations, the random − → R os values are derived from a Gaussian distribution covering an area S equal to 2 or 3 reduced unit cells, while the Ω o values are obtained from a Gaussian distribution encompassing an angular region determined by the Heisenberg uncertainty relation. In this aspect, it should be mentioned that the − → R os and Ω o distributions are in principle defined by the profile of a coherent wave packet associated with the impinging particle, which depends on the collimation of the incident beam [30,32,33]. Here we have considered standard sizes of the − → R os and Ω o distributions because reported experimental data [5,8,[22][23][24][25] lack information about collimating parameters.…”
Section: A Scattering Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the θ f -length of GIFAD patterns is affected by the collimating conditions of the incident beam [30,33], not given in Ref. [8], the polar angle is here plotted in arbitrary units.…”
Section: Incidence Along the 110 Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Refs. [3,16,17] it was shown that the experimental collimating scheme noticeably affects GIFAD distributions, allowing one to examine two different interference mechanisms-inter-channel or intra-channel interferences-by varying the size of the collimating aperture. This behavior is related to the transverse length of the surface area that is coherently illuminated by the incident beam, whose determination is indispensable for an appropriate description of the experimental spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, the field has been reinvigorated due to newer, higher-energy helium sources that have allowed observation of diffraction peaks [8] from both insulator [9] (e.g., lithium fluoride) and metallic [10] (e.g., silver) surfaces. In the literature, the phrase coherent scattering has been attached to this process and strides have been made in understanding the different regimes of scattering [11] and the specifics of the outgoing diffraction pattern [12]. Seifert et al [13] alluded to the notion of a Feynman-style [14] which-way measurement process caused by the scatterer-surface interaction, which we explore in more detail here in a gedanken experiment to clarify the notion of coherence (or loss thereof due to surface lattice excitations) in atom-surface scattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%