2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x00008062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Breath-Count Test: An Important Adjunct in the Triaging of Patients in a Mass-Casualty Incident Due to Botulism

Abstract: Clostridium botulinum toxins, the most poisonous substance known to humankind, are considered to be a [US] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Category A bioterrorist agent. Despite this concern, little has been published with regard to the tactical aspects of triaging a mass-casualty event involving botulism victims arriving at an emergency department. Because neuromuscular-ventilatory failure is a principal reason for botulism's early morbidity and mortality, using a quick and sensitive test to evalua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The instrument used was a questionnaire developed by the authors based upon information available on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website as well as from peer‐reviewed publications. (Arnon et al., ; Dembek, Smith, & Rusnak, ; Rega, Bork, Burkholder‐Allen, Bisesi, & Gold, ; Rega et al., ; Sobel, ; Van Rynen, Rega, Budd, & Burkholder‐Allen, ) The information was distilled into 11 multiple choice items that addressed key areas including types of botulism, pathophysiology, clinical signs and symptoms, and treatment. Demographic items about professional preparation, clinical experience, area of practice, perceived knowledge of botulism and attendance at disaster medicine classes were also included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument used was a questionnaire developed by the authors based upon information available on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website as well as from peer‐reviewed publications. (Arnon et al., ; Dembek, Smith, & Rusnak, ; Rega, Bork, Burkholder‐Allen, Bisesi, & Gold, ; Rega et al., ; Sobel, ; Van Rynen, Rega, Budd, & Burkholder‐Allen, ) The information was distilled into 11 multiple choice items that addressed key areas including types of botulism, pathophysiology, clinical signs and symptoms, and treatment. Demographic items about professional preparation, clinical experience, area of practice, perceived knowledge of botulism and attendance at disaster medicine classes were also included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this, it is likely that the numeric count is impaired in individuals with lung restriction or severe airway obstruction, as both reduce lung volume in one breath [43]. This notion is supported by previous research evaluating the application of SBCT with a random marker of respiratory dysfunction in screening patients during the botulism envenomation epidemic [11], assessing respiratory decompensation in MG [48], as a screening test to segregate adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [14,49], and to predict respiratory failure in Guillain-Barré syndrome [31]. Although the study by Quin et al [44] evaluated patients with neuromuscular diseases (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis), the authors did not present correlation measures in their analysis and for this reason it was not included in the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In this sense, Single Breath Counting Technique (SBCT) appears as an interesting alternative because it uses only the voice as a measurement parameter to assess lung functionality [8,9], especially in patients with infectious respiratory diseases. Another possible advantage would be its epidemiological use for screening an early pulmonary alteration, as well as monitoring the clinical evolution, and can be applied in different places, such as schools, clubs, basic health units, by teleconsultation, and even at home [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These alternative bedside assessment tools are inexpensive, can be easily taught, learnt and administered and are reproducible. 4 They include the cough test, wheeze test, Debono's whistle test, Snider's match blow test, breath holding time test and single breath count amongst many others. [5][6][7][8] exhalation and is measured using a simple, portable hand held flow gauge device called the peak flow meter in liter/minute (L/min).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%