2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ib00146k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-cell analysis of early antiviral gene expression reveals a determinant of stochasticIFNB1expression

Abstract: RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) are cytoplasmic sensors of viral RNA that trigger the signaling cascade that leads to type I interferon (IFN) production. Transcriptional induction of RLRs by IFN is believed to play the role of positive feedback to further amplify viral sensing. We found that RLRs and several other IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) are induced early in viral infection independent of IFN. Expression of these early ISGs requires IRF3/IRF7 and is highly correlated amongst them. Simultaneous detection of mRN… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At 6 h post infection with the IFN inducer virus Clone 13, 21 genes were upregulated (Figures 2A and 2B). Among these were prototypical, IRF3-driven genes (IFNB1, CCL5, CXCL10, IFIT1 to 3, OAS1, and OASL), and others reported to be expressed by infected cells (DDX58, DDX60, DHX58, IFIH1, IFI44, ISG15) (Balogh et al., 2014, Doganay et al., 2017, Glennon et al., 2015, Grandvaux et al., 2002, McWhirter et al., 2004, Puthia et al., 2016, Schmid et al., 2010). By contrast, upregulated genes such as IRF7, MX1, MX2, OAS3, SAMD9, and USP18 are prototypical ISGs (Rusinova et al., 2013, Shaw et al., 2017) that most likely are activated by the Clone 13-induced IFN in the supernatant (see later discussion).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 6 h post infection with the IFN inducer virus Clone 13, 21 genes were upregulated (Figures 2A and 2B). Among these were prototypical, IRF3-driven genes (IFNB1, CCL5, CXCL10, IFIT1 to 3, OAS1, and OASL), and others reported to be expressed by infected cells (DDX58, DDX60, DHX58, IFIH1, IFI44, ISG15) (Balogh et al., 2014, Doganay et al., 2017, Glennon et al., 2015, Grandvaux et al., 2002, McWhirter et al., 2004, Puthia et al., 2016, Schmid et al., 2010). By contrast, upregulated genes such as IRF7, MX1, MX2, OAS3, SAMD9, and USP18 are prototypical ISGs (Rusinova et al., 2013, Shaw et al., 2017) that most likely are activated by the Clone 13-induced IFN in the supernatant (see later discussion).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the extent to which IFN induction and signaling within a specific cell is dependent on extracellular IFN levels is unclear. IFN independent pathways that upregulate ISGs exist [ 70 , 71 ]. Individual cells can alter their IFN secretion rates through autocrine-mediated IFN signaling, an effect that is not present in our model, which assumes that secretion rates are determined by a single global extracellular IFN level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the pivotal roles of IFN-Is in multiple physiological and pathological conditions, it may be surprising that only small fractions of cells begin producing IFN-I upon viral infection, in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo [7,13,[16][17][18][19]. Of note, these fractions of first responders, also referred to as 'precocious cells' or 'early responding cells', are proposed to arise from all-or-nothing cellular decision-making, a phenomenon that has been observed for a variety of proinflammatory cytokines [7,[20][21][22]. In turn, IFN-Is prime surrounding cells via paracrine signaling to enhance IFN-I production upon viral recognition, a process initiated by a much larger fraction of so-called cellular second responders;…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%