2021
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single cell capture, isolation, and long‐term in‐situ imaging using quantitative self‐interference spectroscopy

Abstract: Single cell research with microfluidic chip is of vital importance in biomedical studies and clinical medicine. Simultaneous microfluidic cell manipulations and long-term cell monitoring needs further investigations due to the lack of label-free quantitative imaging techniques and systems. In this work, single cell capture, isolation and longterm in-situ monitoring was realized with a microfluidic cell chip, compact cell incubator and quantitative self-interference spectroscopy. The proposed imaging method cou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interferometric spectra and statistical results are shown in Figure C,D. To determine the limit of detection (LOD), three times the standard deviation divided by the fitting slope was calculated . Therefore, the LOD for pure dsDNA samples was 3 × 0.10/0.0895 = 3.35 ng/μL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interferometric spectra and statistical results are shown in Figure C,D. To determine the limit of detection (LOD), three times the standard deviation divided by the fitting slope was calculated . Therefore, the LOD for pure dsDNA samples was 3 × 0.10/0.0895 = 3.35 ng/μL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, dry cell mass remained nearly constant during osmotic pressure variations, whereas cellular size changed dramatically. This means that MWII could reveal the intrinsic cellular status without culture environment fluctuation disturbance, which is a potential merit for biological applications [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, ∆ obtained contains thickness information of the double-stranded DNA layer, and its corresponding calculation formula is ∆ = 2𝑛𝐷𝑁𝐴𝜎, defined optically as the optical path difference [16] . Considering that in practical situations, the double-stranded DNA layer formed by the amplification product is not dense, and the average refractive index of the double-stranded DNA layer is not easily measured directly, we select the optical path difference ∆ as the physical quantity representing the double-stranded DNA layer.…”
Section: Label-free Detection With Hyperspectral Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%