The ability to monitor the efficacy of an anticancer treatment in real time can have a critical effect on the outcome. Currently, clinical readouts of efficacy rely on indirect or anatomic measurements, which occur over prolonged time scales postchemotherapy or postimmunotherapy and may not be concordant with the actual effect. Here we describe the biology-inspired engineering of a simple 2-in-1 reporter nanoparticle that not only delivers a cytotoxic or an immunotherapy payload to the tumor but also reports back on the efficacy in real time. The reporter nanoparticles are engineered from a novel two-staged stimuli-responsive polymeric material with an optimal ratio of an enzyme-cleavable drug or immunotherapy (effector elements) and a drug function-activatable reporter element. The spatiotemporally constrained delivery of the effector and the reporter elements in a single nanoparticle produces maximum signal enhancement due to the availability of the reporter element in the same cell as the drug, thereby effectively capturing the temporal apoptosis process. Using chemotherapy-sensitive and chemotherapy-resistant tumors in vivo, we show that the reporter nanoparticles can provide a real-time noninvasive readout of tumor response to chemotherapy. The reporter nanoparticle can also monitor the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in melanoma. The self-reporting capability, for the first time to our knowledge, captures an anticancer nanoparticle in action in vivo.T he failure of anticancer therapy is a major cause of mortality (1). Although the current dogma underlying resistance is based on the Darwinian selection of mutations acquired over time under chemotherapy pressure, emerging evidence indicates that anticancer drugs can be rendered ineffective early on by intrinsic or adaptive resistance as a function of tumor heterogeneity (2-4). For example, response rates to first-line chemotherapy treatments in metastatic breast cancer patients range from a dismal 30% to 70%, and patients with disease progression need to be switched to a different drug (5). Similarly, about 40-60% of patients with a wild-type KRAS do not respond to cetuximab (6). The ability to detect early whether a treatment is working or not and to switch, if necessary, to a regimen that is effective can have a significant effect on the outcome as well as quality of life (7,8).Currently, tumor response to therapy is determined using techniques for direct anatomical measurements, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging, or indirectly using positron emission tomography with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG-PET) to quantify metabolic activity. However, these techniques lack the sensitivity or specificity to enable very early response assessment, and often, clinicopathological and metabolic readouts can be discordant (5, 9, 10). In the case of immunotherapy, for example, a productive immune response (T cell infiltration) and the unimpeded growth of the tumor will both be manifest as progression on the conventional ...