2018
DOI: 10.1126/science.aao3791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-cell multiomics sequencing and analyses of human colorectal cancer

Abstract: Although genomic instability, epigenetic abnormality, and gene expression dysregulation are hallmarks of colorectal cancer, these features have not been simultaneously analyzed at single-cell resolution. Using optimized single-cell multiomics sequencing together with multiregional sampling of the primary tumor and lymphatic and distant metastases, we developed insights beyond intratumoral heterogeneity. Genome-wide DNA methylation levels were relatively consistent within a single genetic sublineage. The genome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
325
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(337 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
325
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper describes interfacial nanoinjection (INJ), a simple microfluidic droplet‐handling system developed for multistep nanoliter assays on standard 96‐ or 384‐well plates, and a simple pipeline that couples INJ and fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) for single‐cell analyses with high versatility, high throughput, and low cost. Recent research advances have promoted the study of biological systems with respect to their physiological phenotypes, genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, multiomics, and biodiversity at the single‐cell level. Single‐cell analysis allows the fundamental understanding of cell‐to‐cell heterogeneity and provides unprecedented resolution in complex biological systems, especially those from rare cell types or uncultivated microbes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper describes interfacial nanoinjection (INJ), a simple microfluidic droplet‐handling system developed for multistep nanoliter assays on standard 96‐ or 384‐well plates, and a simple pipeline that couples INJ and fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) for single‐cell analyses with high versatility, high throughput, and low cost. Recent research advances have promoted the study of biological systems with respect to their physiological phenotypes, genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, multiomics, and biodiversity at the single‐cell level. Single‐cell analysis allows the fundamental understanding of cell‐to‐cell heterogeneity and provides unprecedented resolution in complex biological systems, especially those from rare cell types or uncultivated microbes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…scRNA-seq reports in the past years have provided useful information in this respect. Different types of CAFs have been reported in breast and colorectal tumors, which is likely to be associated with different cell origins [34][35][36]. Additionally, each group of CAFs has special functions in the recruitment of immune cells and in the induction of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in tumor cells [24,29,34,36].…”
Section: Tumor Microenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbreviation: EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition. See [24,25,29,30,[34][35][36]40,43,[48][49][50].…”
Section: Key Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings underscore the importance of using single-cell profiles as a rich, comprehensive and interpretable phenotypic readout. With advances in other single cell profiling approaches (e.g., single-cell ATAC-Seq (Rubin et al, 2019)), single-cell multi-omics (Bian et al, 2018), and spatial genomics Rodriques et al, 2019), we expect in vivo Perturb-Seq to be coupled in the near future with diverse readouts to better define the function of disease-risk associated variants from molecular mechanisms to non-cell autonomous effects in tissues. Spatial transcriptomics in particular should be well suited for use with in vivo Perturb-Seq, and should help uncover non-cell autonomous effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%