2009
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v114.22.1582.1582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Cell Network Profiles in Non-M3 AML Associated with Patient Response to Standard Induction Therapy.

Abstract: 1582 Poster Board I-608 Background Traditional AML prognostic markers are based on clinical characterization (e.g. age) or static measurements of leukemia biology present at diagnosis, such as cytogenetics and isolated molecular events (e.g. presence of FLT3 ITD mutation). No validated methods currently exist to predict the disease response to standard AML induction chemotherapy for individual patients. Objectives: Single Cell Network Profiling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the sample set was unintentionally biased with samples predominantly from NR, female patients of younger age with intermediate cytogenetics ( Table S1 ). In spite of these limitations, univariate analysis of this sample set and an independent sample set (with 57 CR samples out of a total of 88 samples) from a separate institution revealed common nodes for CR and NR stratification suggesting that survival, DDR and apoptosis pathways may be relevant ways to characterize AML disease subtypes with further follow-up warranted in additional AML sample cohorts [28] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the sample set was unintentionally biased with samples predominantly from NR, female patients of younger age with intermediate cytogenetics ( Table S1 ). In spite of these limitations, univariate analysis of this sample set and an independent sample set (with 57 CR samples out of a total of 88 samples) from a separate institution revealed common nodes for CR and NR stratification suggesting that survival, DDR and apoptosis pathways may be relevant ways to characterize AML disease subtypes with further follow-up warranted in additional AML sample cohorts [28] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Heat map of Jak/Stat signaling responses, where each row represents a specific readout and metric such as: p-Stat1 | Basal, IL-27 → p-Stat1 | Total. The samples have been ordered according to IL-27 → p-Stat3 | Total, since this node had the highest AUC and p-value for stratifying CRs from NRs [28] . Cytogenetic risk and FAB categories are noted for each sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations