2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-cell PCR of genomic DNA enabled by automated single-cell printing for cell isolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the recommended amount of template DNA, according to the manufacturer (Available online: ), is 10 4 copies (~34.5 ng of human genomic DNA) or above, evaluation using the PCR protocol described in this study achieved a limit of detection (LOD) of ≤1.25 ng of human genomic DNA (Methods S2). Further optimizations, including increasing the number of PCR cycles [35], may bring the LOD down to the theoretical limit of a single genomic copy [36]; nevertheless, as a clinical laboratory performing diagnostic testing, it may be preferable to balance among economical use of template DNA, reasonable number of PCR cycles and standardizing laboratory protocols to avoid excessive pipetting and manual dilution steps. With regard to these, PCR-HRM is considered less robust compared to Sanger sequencing and PCR-RFLP, which depend only on the presence of adequate amplicon for subsequent cycle sequencing and restriction enzyme digestion, rather than comparable amplification efficiency within a critical number of cycles [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the recommended amount of template DNA, according to the manufacturer (Available online: ), is 10 4 copies (~34.5 ng of human genomic DNA) or above, evaluation using the PCR protocol described in this study achieved a limit of detection (LOD) of ≤1.25 ng of human genomic DNA (Methods S2). Further optimizations, including increasing the number of PCR cycles [35], may bring the LOD down to the theoretical limit of a single genomic copy [36]; nevertheless, as a clinical laboratory performing diagnostic testing, it may be preferable to balance among economical use of template DNA, reasonable number of PCR cycles and standardizing laboratory protocols to avoid excessive pipetting and manual dilution steps. With regard to these, PCR-HRM is considered less robust compared to Sanger sequencing and PCR-RFLP, which depend only on the presence of adequate amplicon for subsequent cycle sequencing and restriction enzyme digestion, rather than comparable amplification efficiency within a critical number of cycles [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, as described in previous sections, combinations of both materials can deliver more complex building blocks for constructs produced using additive manufacturing. This is an important consideration, as currently available additive manufacturing tools for single-cell printing do not reach further than printing of 2D patterns, despite efforts placed in improving nozzle designs and positioning stages [199,200], although such 2D patterns have proven to be useful for single-cell genomic analysis [199], among others [201,202]. In this context, microfluidic solutions may be advantageous for separation and isolation of cells ahead of being expelled through the nozzle orifice.…”
Section: Building Blocks For Bioprintingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal, single cell lysis for single cell PCR has been executed off chip using a standard thermocycler and PCR tubes 192 . The lysis step required a 95° C hold for 90 seconds.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%