2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Cell Proteomics by Data-Independent Acquisition To Study Embryonic Asymmetry in Xenopus laevis

Abstract: Techniques that allow single cell analysis are gaining widespread attention and most of these studies utilize genomics-based approaches. While nanofluidic technologies have enabled mass spectrometric analysis of single cells, these measurements have been limited to metabolomics and lipidomic studies. Single cell proteomics has the potential to improve our understanding of intercellular heterogeneity. However, this approach has faced challenges including limited sample availability, as well as a requirement of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have since taken a similar multiplexed approach using a carrier channel in combination with a cutting-edge sample preparation technique known as NanoPOTS, and demonstrated very promising results when sample loss is decreased to a minimum [27][28][29] . Although label-free approaches have also shown promising results [30][31][32][33][34] , their throughput currently lags behind the multiplexed approach. Comprehensive evaluations of multiplexed scMS using an isobaric carrier 29,35,36 have further demonstrated the feasibility of the approach, concluded on the tradeoffs of increasing the level of signal boosting with the isobaric carrier, and indicated the importance of estimating the reliability of protein quantification when implementing the method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have since taken a similar multiplexed approach using a carrier channel in combination with a cutting-edge sample preparation technique known as NanoPOTS, and demonstrated very promising results when sample loss is decreased to a minimum [27][28][29] . Although label-free approaches have also shown promising results [30][31][32][33][34] , their throughput currently lags behind the multiplexed approach. Comprehensive evaluations of multiplexed scMS using an isobaric carrier 29,35,36 have further demonstrated the feasibility of the approach, concluded on the tradeoffs of increasing the level of signal boosting with the isobaric carrier, and indicated the importance of estimating the reliability of protein quantification when implementing the method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard bottom-up proteomics requires extraction and digestion of the proteins, often also calling for chemical reduction/alkylation to deepen the coverage of the detectable proteome. These starting protein amounts, however, were ~1-10 million times smaller than traditionally processed in MSbased bottom-up proteomics, ~1-100 thousand times less than handled from single dissected cells, 29,32,49 and ~100-times smaller than recently collected from individual cells using capillary microsampling 33,34,50 . As a simplified alternative to automated droplet processing [18][19][20][21] , we opted to carry out the processing steps in Lo-Bind vials, common consumables in laboratories (see Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[309] To make single-cell proteomics a mainstream reality, highly sensitive methods for sample collection, clean-up, and detection are required. [310] Even with these sizeable obstacles, scientists are still optimistic about implementing single-cell proteomics to directly analyze full protein profiles. Unlike transcriptomic studies, no amplification of cellular protein is needed due to its natural, high abundance, even in a single cell.…”
Section: Single-cell -Omicsmentioning
confidence: 99%