2018
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddy400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-cell RNA sequencing in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy disease etiology and development

Abstract: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is characterized by sporadic de-repression of the transcription factor DUX4 in skeletal muscle. DUX4 activates a cascade of muscle disrupting events, eventually leading to muscle atrophy and apoptosis. Yet, how sporadic DUX4 expression leads to the generalized muscle wasting remains unclear. Transcriptome analyses have systematically been challenged by the majority of nuclei being DUX4 neg , weakening the DUX4 transcriptome signature. Moreover, DUX4 has been shown … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
113
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
113
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1B). In a recent single cell RNA-seq of combined FSHD1 and FSHD2 unfused myocytes, we found DUX4 expression in 27/5133 (0.5%) FSHD cells 32 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1B). In a recent single cell RNA-seq of combined FSHD1 and FSHD2 unfused myocytes, we found DUX4 expression in 27/5133 (0.5%) FSHD cells 32 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…We previously evaluated the discriminatory power of the 3 DUX4 target gene scores on unfused FSHD myocytes profiled by single cell RNA-seq, and although significant discriminators, no score achieved an AUC>0.56 24 . However, 27/5133 myocytes expressed DUX4 32 , which offers greater power for assessment of DUX4 association with the target gene scores in differentiated muscle cells, compared to the 3 DUX4 positive myotube samples. Surprisingly, while the early and late DUX4 target gene expression scores correlated in this single cell data set (Choi et al, vs Geng et al, p< 2.2×10 −16 , Pearson’s r =0.54, Choi et al, vs Yao et al, p <2.2×10 −16 , Pearson’s r= 0.38, Geng et al, vs Yao et al, p <2.2×10 −16 , Pearson’s r= 0.86 Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations