2018
DOI: 10.1101/365734
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-cell transcriptome analysis during cardiogenesis reveals basis for organ level developmental anomalies

Abstract: Organogenesis involves integration of myriad cell types with reciprocal interactions, each progressing through successive stages of lineage specification and differentiation. Establishment of unique gene networks within each cell dictates fate determination, and mutations of transcription factors that drive such networks can result in birth defects. Congenital heart defects are the most common malformations and are caused by disruption of discrete subsets of progenitors1–3, however, determining the transcripti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the mesenchymal cluster c5, which comprised cells mainly from the early stages (Fig 4B), was inferred by the algorithm to represent the earliest state of the CNCC‐derived mesenchymal cells after migrating into the heart. Consistent with that Crabp1 is the top marker of CNCC‐derived mesenchymal cells at E9.25 (Soysa et al , 2019), c5 showed high expression of Crabp1 and Crabp2 (Appendix Fig S9A and B). As expected, starting from c5, the trajectory was split into two major branches: mesenchymal cell and VSMC developmental branches (Fig 7).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Notably, the mesenchymal cluster c5, which comprised cells mainly from the early stages (Fig 4B), was inferred by the algorithm to represent the earliest state of the CNCC‐derived mesenchymal cells after migrating into the heart. Consistent with that Crabp1 is the top marker of CNCC‐derived mesenchymal cells at E9.25 (Soysa et al , 2019), c5 showed high expression of Crabp1 and Crabp2 (Appendix Fig S9A and B). As expected, starting from c5, the trajectory was split into two major branches: mesenchymal cell and VSMC developmental branches (Fig 7).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In NKX2-5 KO lines, we did not detect any cavity formation defects at the cardiac mesoderm stage and they eventually formed TNNT2 + cardioids (Figures S3A-S3C). HAND1 expression in NKX2-5 KO cardiac mesoderm remained unaffected and this is in line with the delayed onset of NKX2-5 relative to HAND1 expression in cardioids (Figures 1E and S3C) as well as in human and mouse FHF cardiac mesoderm (de Soysa et al, 2019;Tyser et al, 2021). However, HAND1 expression appeared reduced at the CM stage in NKX2-5 KO cardioids (Figure S3C), which is in agreement with findings in mouse and human CMs where NKX2-5 is acting upstream of HAND1 (Anderson et al, 2018;Tanaka et al, 1999).…”
Section: Wnt and Bmp Control Cardioid Self-organizationsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This subpopulation showed high expression of the Crabp1 gene, encoding cellular retinoic acid binding protein 1 (Figure 6G), which has been reported as the top marker of CNCC-derived mesenchymal cells at E9.25. 42 It also showed high expression of the Crabp2 gene, encoding cellular retinoic acid binding protein 2 (Figure 6H). The expression of Crabp1 and Crabp2 , two important regulators of retinoic acid signaling, decreased during development.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%