2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.99.033412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-center approach for photodetachment and radiative electron attachment: Comparison with other theoretical approaches and with experimental photodetachment data

Abstract: A single-center method for calculating photodetachment cross section for anions and radiative electron attachment cross section for neutral molecules by microreversibility is presented. It uses the integral equation method to calculate the ejected electron's continuum wave function while the single-electron bound function of the anion is described by the Dyson orbital. It is compared with related theoretical approaches and benchmarked to the experimental photodetachment cross sections of O 2 − , OH − , and CN … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Dyson orbitals have been extracted from the ground state CASSCF wavefunctions of the anions and the corresponding neutral molecules. 30 If ψ N ( r 1 , r 2 , . .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Dyson orbitals have been extracted from the ground state CASSCF wavefunctions of the anions and the corresponding neutral molecules. 30 If ψ N ( r 1 , r 2 , . .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N 0 is the product of the spin and electronic degeneracy factor, 30 Ψ lm (r) is the wave function of the outgoing electron, and Ψ d (r) is the Dyson orbital. Let us recall that the Dyson orbital 38,39 is a molecular orbital which represents the change of the molecular electronic configuration induced by electron attachment or by photodetachment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the pathways for the formation of anions by electron attachment face restrictions in the low-density ISM where three-body collisions to dispose of the excess energy are not plausible. Radiative electron attachment (REA) to neutral species is considered to form anions in the ISM (Chandrasekaran et al 2017;Douguet et al 2013;Lara-Moreno et al 2019a, 2019b. REA cross sections could be enhanced in molecules with permanent dipole moment above the critical value of 1.65 D, since they could accommodate dipole-bound anion states (DBS) that lie below but close to the detachment threshold (Garrett 1982;Anstöter et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its productions by the REA to CN radical, the DEA to cyanopolyynes HC n N (n = 1-3) or MgCN/MgNC, and the H − + HC n N reactions were evaluated with modeling calculations 1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10] . However, the role of REA process, initially proposed as the dominant mechanism 4 , is still open to the debate [8][9][10][11][12][13] , in particular, the CN − abundance in IRC + 10216 predicted with statistics theory calculations indicated a significant deviation from the observation 8,13 . Recently, the contribution from the DEA to H 2 CN in IRC + 10216 was eliminated either 14 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the CN − (X 1 Σ + ) can be stabilized in various vibrational states (ν) up to ν = 17, while that in the higher ν-state is believed to quickly decay via vibrationinduced electron detachment 16 . Therefore, the vibrationally or electronically excited states above the electron autodetachment threshold of CN − , namely, those locate 3.862 eV (EA) higher than X 1 Σ + (ν = 0), are assumed to have no contributions to the CN − abundance and some chemical reactions in the interstellar space 1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . However, a long-lived anion in high-lying excited states can be observed, if its vibration-induced electron detachment proceeds in a non-negligible time, for instance, on a timescale comparable to the lifetimes (such as the nanoseconds to microseconds of LiH − and OH − , ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%