1981
DOI: 10.21236/ada105469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Channel Seismic Event Detection

Abstract: ilter. Among the worst were human analysts when operating in the *pick everyhingP mode, the deflection detector, and a prediction-error type detector. The uman analyst could, however, improve to be nearly the best if sufficient care as taken. With a modest amount of care, any detector can be modified to perform ell as an element of an operational system and the choice of single channel etector can be made on other grounds than pure detection such as availability or omputation speed.In this report also we outli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These more recent studies do not include former and present improvements in machine detection of seismic phases, as reviewed by Blandford et al (1981).…”
Section: Purpose Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These more recent studies do not include former and present improvements in machine detection of seismic phases, as reviewed by Blandford et al (1981).…”
Section: Purpose Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%