Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis 2008
DOI: 10.1002/9783527610044.hetcat0067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Crystal Surfaces

Abstract: The sections in this article are Introduction Techniques Examples of Studies with Single Crystals The Active Site Model of a Catalytic Surface Catalysis over an Adsorbed Overlayer Structure‐Sensitive or Structure‐Insensitive Reactions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should be seen with respect to the traditional classification or definition of a reaction as structure insensitive based merely on the macroscopically observed catalytic function as typically explored only over a small set of feed conditions. [1][2][3] As exemplified by the data obtained here for RuO 2 (111) and RuO 2 (110) this can be a dangerous concept that does not adequately capture the underlying micro-to mesoscopic complexities. We stress, however, that this is a general statement based on the well-defined theory-theory comparison of the two 1p-kMC models of RuO 2 (110) and RuO 2 (111).…”
Section: Coverage and Turnover Frequency At Catalytically Active Condmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This should be seen with respect to the traditional classification or definition of a reaction as structure insensitive based merely on the macroscopically observed catalytic function as typically explored only over a small set of feed conditions. [1][2][3] As exemplified by the data obtained here for RuO 2 (111) and RuO 2 (110) this can be a dangerous concept that does not adequately capture the underlying micro-to mesoscopic complexities. We stress, however, that this is a general statement based on the well-defined theory-theory comparison of the two 1p-kMC models of RuO 2 (110) and RuO 2 (111).…”
Section: Coverage and Turnover Frequency At Catalytically Active Condmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Detailed kinetic studies comparing the catalytic activity of different single-crystal facets provide important insights on several accounts. They allow for a straightforward assessment of the structure sensitivity of the catalytic reaction [1][2][3] , which constitutes an important first milestone when aiming to relate the detailed knowledge from model catalysts to the performance of real supported catalysts. They also contribute to a more systematic bridging of the materials gap when employed to analyze data obtained for polycrystalline powders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, a model catalyst strategy has been developed in which uniform and well-defined surfaces are used as models of powder catalyst surfaces for the studies of surface structure–catalytic property relationships . Single-crystal-based materials have been extensively used as model catalysts, but there exist the “materials gap” and “pressure gap” between single-crystal-based model catalysts studied under ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) conditions and corresponding powder catalysts working at atmospheric or higher pressures. Consequently, fundamental understandings acquired with single-crystal-based model catalysts sometimes cannot be simply extended to working powder catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional model catalysts are single crystal-based model catalysts . Surface-sensitive electron spectroscopic and microscopic characterizations of single crystal-based model catalysts have significantly advanced the fundamental understanding of surface chemistry of solid catalysts. However, the so-called “materials gap” and “pressure gap” have been well recognized to exist between single crystal-based model catalysts and corresponding powder catalysts due to their differences, respectively, in surface structures and working pressures; thus, the acquired fundamental understanding of single crystal-based model catalysts sometimes cannot be simply extended to corresponding powder catalysts. Meanwhile, due to very small surface areas, reliable evaluations of the catalytic performance of single crystal-based model catalysts are difficult; thus, single crystal-based model catalysts are suitable for fundamental studies of the structure–surface chemistry relation but not of the structure–surface chemistry–activity relation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%