2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4802797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single domain Bi2Se3 films grown on InP(111)A by molecular-beam epitaxy

Abstract: We report the growth of single-domain epitaxial Bi2Se3 films on InP(111)A substrate by molecular-beam epitaxy. Nucleation of Bi2Se3 proceeds at steps, so the lattices of the substrate play the guiding role for a unidirectional crystalline film in the step-flow growth mode. There exists a strong chemical interaction between atoms at the heterointerface, so the growth does not follow the van der Waals epitaxy process. A mounded morphology of thick Bi2Se3 epilayers suggests a growth kinetics dictated by the Ehrli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, on rougher substrates, Bi 2 Se 3 films grew via a step flow growth method, and single-domain films were consistently observed. The strong interaction between InP substrates and Bi 2 Se 3 films has led Guo et al to suggest that these films are not grown by van der Waals epitaxy at all [38]. It may be that the low lattice mismatch between Bi 2 Se 3 and InP (~3%) allows the substrate to have a greater influence on the subsequent film growth.…”
Section: Substrate Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, on rougher substrates, Bi 2 Se 3 films grew via a step flow growth method, and single-domain films were consistently observed. The strong interaction between InP substrates and Bi 2 Se 3 films has led Guo et al to suggest that these films are not grown by van der Waals epitaxy at all [38]. It may be that the low lattice mismatch between Bi 2 Se 3 and InP (~3%) allows the substrate to have a greater influence on the subsequent film growth.…”
Section: Substrate Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a traditional III/V chamber, a phosphorous flux is easy to supply, but this becomes much more difficult in a chalcogenide-only chamber. Some success has been obtained by supplying the chalcogenide atom in excess when desorbing surface oxides from III/V and other substrates [38]. In addition to surface oxides, a large fraction of the available substrates have surface dangling bonds which must be satisfied.…”
Section: Substrate Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some typical substrates commonly used are GaAs (111), InP (111), sapphire, Si (111), and SrTiO 3 (STO) (111), among others. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] These films grow c-axis oriented out of plane, using the typical hexagonal indexing scheme where the (0 0 n) reflections are along the (111) direction if the rhombohedral unit cell was used instead.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deposited layer followed the threefold symmetry of the substrate surface and no twin domains were detected. For vicinal InP(111)A substrates Guo et al (2013) have found that the miscut steps play a stabilizing role in the step-flow growth mode which suppresses the twin domains as well. In the mentioned work the existence of twin domains was detected by XRD pole-figure measurements and microscopically observed by cross-sectional high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%