2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-dose actinomycin D: Efficacy in the prophylaxis of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in adolescents with high-risk hydatidiform mole

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a study that reviewed the metaanalysis results in low and high-risk pregnancies showed that the prophylactic chemotherapy could lower GTN in almost two third of the patients (Wang et al, 2017). The same results were obtained from another study, which only considered patients with high-risk molar pregnancies (Uberti et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, a study that reviewed the metaanalysis results in low and high-risk pregnancies showed that the prophylactic chemotherapy could lower GTN in almost two third of the patients (Wang et al, 2017). The same results were obtained from another study, which only considered patients with high-risk molar pregnancies (Uberti et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Results showed that prophylactic chemotherapy could lower the GTN rate, as well as treatment costs, though the usage of this drug has no significant impact on the morbidity and diseases intensity (Vargas et al, 2014). This reduction was quantified in two studies; Uberti et al showed that the use of actinomycin D prior to suction curettage reduces the GTN rate up to 46% (Uberti et al, 2006), while Cunha et al, (2009 found this reduction rate to be 76% (Uberti et al, 2009). However, this study practiced using MTX since actinomycin D was not available in the country this study performed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, prophylactic chemotherapy exposed 80% of patients unnecessarily to toxic side effects [ 25 ] and might lead to incomplete protection against persistent tumour [ 24 ]. Previous studies [ 9 , 26 ] reported a significant reduction in the rate of GTN transformation in adolescents and adults, while the targeted group was mostly below 40 years old, whether prophylactic chemotherapy could prevent post-molar GTN in women above 40 years old is still unclear. Our study was the first of its kind to study patients who were at least 40 years old and found that prophylactic chemotherapy could not reduce the incidence of post-molar GTN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tow, Savage and Tsukmoto et al [ 5 7 ] reported that women greater than 40 years old had a probability of 23-37% of developing persistent GTN after uterine evacuation, while the likelihood in women older than 50 years old was as high as 31-56%. In comparison, relatively younger patients had a lower probability of 15-20% [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it does not affect reproductive outcomes and has also been shown to reduce psychological angst, medical visits, and operational costs associated with management of post-molar GTN/persistent GTD (Uberti et al 2009). Though the use of chemoprophylaxis is not widely accepted, most agree that its use is most appropriate for patients with high-risk moles in settings where serial beta-hCG levels cannot be followed and in those with poor compliance, such as in the adolescent population (Uberti et al 2006). Table 9 offers a scoring system for the prediction of developing GTN in women with a molar pregnancy.…”
Section: Post-molar Prophylactic Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%