2023
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2022.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Ertapenem Increases Compliance with Recommendations for Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another comparative study found that LOS from C/M use was not different than for cefotetan, but overall hospital costs were significantly higher [50]. Our study found that ertapenem and cefotetan provided better overall outcomes when compared to C/M or cefoxitin alone for ECRS [51,52]. Further, evidence suggests that ertapenem may be more effective than cefotetan [53].…”
Section: Part 2-antibiotics and Infection (Ssi And Other)mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Another comparative study found that LOS from C/M use was not different than for cefotetan, but overall hospital costs were significantly higher [50]. Our study found that ertapenem and cefotetan provided better overall outcomes when compared to C/M or cefoxitin alone for ECRS [51,52]. Further, evidence suggests that ertapenem may be more effective than cefotetan [53].…”
Section: Part 2-antibiotics and Infection (Ssi And Other)mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…There are also concerns with high rates of extended prophylaxis postoperatively to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs) among LMICs, with the prevention of SSIs with antibiotics a priority across hospitals and countries, given the increasing prevalence of AMR [60][61][62][63]. However, extended prophylaxis and the use of inappropriate "Watch" antibiotics increase adverse reactions, costs, and AMR, with limited or no improvement in patient outcomes [64][65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%