2017
DOI: 10.1111/vox.12477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single‐dose intravenous iron infusion or oral iron for treatment of fatigue after postpartum haemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Background and Objectives To evaluate the clinical efficacy of a single-dose intravenous infusion of iron isomaltoside compared with current treatment practice with oral iron measured by physical fatigue in women after postpartum haemorrhage. Materials and MethodsSingle-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Participants received intravenous iron (n = 97) or oral iron (n = 99), and completed the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and haematological and iron p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
102
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(50 reference statements)
4
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with the main trial [18]. In the main trial, there was an estimated difference of À0.97 in physical fatigue score between the treatment groups which was less than the predefined minimum clinically relevant difference of 1.8 required for claiming superiority [18]. However, in this subanalysis, the estimated difference of À2.3 reached the predefined target of 1.8, and superiority was confirmed for iron isomaltoside compared with current treatment practice with oral iron in women suffering from severe fatigue after PPH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is consistent with the main trial [18]. In the main trial, there was an estimated difference of À0.97 in physical fatigue score between the treatment groups which was less than the predefined minimum clinically relevant difference of 1.8 required for claiming superiority [18]. However, in this subanalysis, the estimated difference of À2.3 reached the predefined target of 1.8, and superiority was confirmed for iron isomaltoside compared with current treatment practice with oral iron in women suffering from severe fatigue after PPH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The difference estimate between the two treatments groups was À2.3 (p < .0001), showing that treatment with iron isomaltoside lead to a significantly higher decrease in physical fatigue when compared to current treatment practice with oral iron. This finding is consistent with the main trial [18]. In the main trial, there was an estimated difference of À0.97 in physical fatigue score between the treatment groups which was less than the predefined minimum clinically relevant difference of 1.8 required for claiming superiority [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations