1982
DOI: 10.1002/bms.1200090103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single dose kinetics of deuterium labelled Δ1-tetrahydrocannabinol in heavy and light cannabis users

Abstract: Deuterium labelled delta 1-tetrahydrocannabinol was administered intravenously (5.0 mg) and by smoking (10.0 mg) to five heavy and four light marihuana users. All subjects smoked an estimated amount of 8.6-9.9 mg delta 1-tetrahydrocannabinol. The plasma levels of delta 1-tetrahydrocannabinol were followed for 48 hours and in two subjects fof 72 hours after administration. The systemic availability after inhalation calculated from the area under curve values was in the range of 27 +/- 10% for the heavy users an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1), reduced the power to demonstrate statistically significant effects. Second, there may have been differences in the strength of cannabis effects available for blockade due to individual differences in smoking dynamics (Huestis et al 1992a) and THC bioavailability (Ohlsson et al 1981(Ohlsson et al , 1982. Third, differences in study design and subject experience, such as length of stay on the research unit before testing or number of prior cannabis cigarettes smoked in the study (none vs. one) may have altered subjects' responsiveness to cannabis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), reduced the power to demonstrate statistically significant effects. Second, there may have been differences in the strength of cannabis effects available for blockade due to individual differences in smoking dynamics (Huestis et al 1992a) and THC bioavailability (Ohlsson et al 1981(Ohlsson et al , 1982. Third, differences in study design and subject experience, such as length of stay on the research unit before testing or number of prior cannabis cigarettes smoked in the study (none vs. one) may have altered subjects' responsiveness to cannabis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is still no consensus, it is probably safe to say that the terminal half-life of THC averages at least one week, but could be considerably longer. The half-life in plasma does not appear to be different between heavy and light users (33,34).…”
Section: Absorption Smoked Cannabismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, about 18% of an inhaled  9 -THC dose is absorbed (Ohlsson et al, 1980), being an oral dose significantly less effective (Nahas, 1979). Moreover,  9 -THC bioavailability after inhalation is highly variable (Barnett et al, 1982Ohlsson et al 1980;Ohlsson et al, 1982, Pérez-Reyes et al, 1982, because it is affected, not only by the specific characteristics of the cigarette and its corresponding combustion, but also by the inhalation intensity, administration duration, among other factors. Experienced smokers inhale more efficiently than inexperienced people, being the  9 -THC bioavailability, in a marijuana cigarette with approximately 1-2% of the drug, between 16 and 40% for chronic users and between 13 and 14% for occasional users (Ohlsson et al, 1982).…”
Section: Toxicokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover,  9 -THC bioavailability after inhalation is highly variable (Barnett et al, 1982Ohlsson et al 1980;Ohlsson et al, 1982, Pérez-Reyes et al, 1982, because it is affected, not only by the specific characteristics of the cigarette and its corresponding combustion, but also by the inhalation intensity, administration duration, among other factors. Experienced smokers inhale more efficiently than inexperienced people, being the  9 -THC bioavailability, in a marijuana cigarette with approximately 1-2% of the drug, between 16 and 40% for chronic users and between 13 and 14% for occasional users (Ohlsson et al, 1982). Cannabinoids oral ingestion leads to lower plasma  9 -THC levels than by inhalation, i.e., gastrointestinal absorption represents, approximately, one third of the achieved via inhalation.…”
Section: Toxicokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation