2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single fiber pull-out test of regenerated cellulose fibers in polypropylene: An energetic evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest pull-out force was obtained with GF(a)-PUR matrix. Moreover, the pull-out force required for PETF with a PUR matrix was higher, with about 21.3 N, than PETF with a PDMS matrix with approximately 8.7 N. However, in terms of the GF bundles, the results show that the removal of the silane-based surface treatment of the GF increased the pull-out force to about 45.6 N. A possible reason for this could be (i) the incompatible sizing provided by the supplier or (ii) the presence of rougher surface conditions [11,25] induced by the piranha acid treaded GF bundles, which was applied to remove the silane-based treatment from the manufacturer. Moreover, all reported measurements for GF show generally higher deviations in contrast to the results with PETF.…”
Section: Fiber Bundle Pull-out Testmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highest pull-out force was obtained with GF(a)-PUR matrix. Moreover, the pull-out force required for PETF with a PUR matrix was higher, with about 21.3 N, than PETF with a PDMS matrix with approximately 8.7 N. However, in terms of the GF bundles, the results show that the removal of the silane-based surface treatment of the GF increased the pull-out force to about 45.6 N. A possible reason for this could be (i) the incompatible sizing provided by the supplier or (ii) the presence of rougher surface conditions [11,25] induced by the piranha acid treaded GF bundles, which was applied to remove the silane-based treatment from the manufacturer. Moreover, all reported measurements for GF show generally higher deviations in contrast to the results with PETF.…”
Section: Fiber Bundle Pull-out Testmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In terms of the various test setups, the FBPO test offers the opportunity to perform experiments faster, more easily, and more economically compared to single fiber measuring devices, which need more careful handling [22] and special test equipment [4]. Besides that, the tests are influenced by the following factors: e.g., (i) the complex stress distribution in a fiber bundle [13,23], (ii) fiber-fiber interaction [24] with more real failure modes [23], or (iii) the presence of statistically distributed filaments inside the fiber bundle [25,26]. These points have a significant effect on the interlaminar shear strength due to the variable cross-section areas of the fiber bundle [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Com relação ao efeito do par fibra/matriz sobre a tensão cisalhante interfacial, de acordo com ZARGES et al [13], a remoção da fibra da matriz circundante é realizada quando a carga necessária para o desacoplamento em estado estacionário é menor que a resistência máxima da fibra. Assim, para cada par fibra/matriz existe uma carga correspondente para que o desacoplamento da fibra ocorra.…”
Section: Ensaio De Arrancamento (Pullout Test)unclassified
“…Para a interpretação das propriedades mecânicas de um compósito, a caracterização da adesão entre a fibra/matriz é de especial importância. Para a análise de compósitos convencionais, como compósitos refor-çados com fibra de vidro ou carbono, alguns ensaios estão disponíveis, sendo o de arrancamento (pullout test) um dos mais aplicados para determinar a tensão necessária para quebrar a interface fibra/matriz do compósito [3,[12][13][14][15][16]. Segundo MONTEIRO e D'ALMEIDA [16], os ensaios de arrancamento visam determinar o comprimento crítico da fibra (lc), e a tensão cisalhante interfacial (τ), associada à transferência de esforços entre a fibra e a matriz de um compósito.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Regarding the different test devices, FBPO testing generally provides the potential to conduct measurements faster, easier and with less complexity to estimate the fiber–matrix adhesion with more realistic failure modes (e.g., statistical fiber distribution or fiber–fiber interaction) than the single fiber tests, which, however, require more sensitive handling [ 8 , 14 ] as well as expensive special test equipment [ 28 , 29 ]. In addition, the FBPO tests are significantly influenced by several factors such as (i) the complex stress distribution in a fiber bundle [ 21 , 30 ], (ii) fiber–fiber interaction [ 29 ] with more real failure modes [ 14 , 31 ] or (iii) the presence of statistically distributed filaments inside the fiber bundle [ 32 , 33 ]. Due to the variable cross-section areas inside a fiber bundle, these aspects influence the interlaminar shear strength [ 19 , 34 ], and, therefore, the results can be considered more reliable for performance predictions on laminate lay-ups [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%