2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single implant-supported molar and premolar crowns: a ten-year retrospective clinical report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
66
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
66
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These complications include SL, CF, implant fixture fracture, de-cementation, PM, and PI, and also, they often occur in multiple-implant restoration splinting 31. In addition, the implant success rate of 1-IR (94.3%) was not significantly lower than that of multiple-implant restoration splinting (97.1%) 32.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These complications include SL, CF, implant fixture fracture, de-cementation, PM, and PI, and also, they often occur in multiple-implant restoration splinting 31. In addition, the implant success rate of 1-IR (94.3%) was not significantly lower than that of multiple-implant restoration splinting (97.1%) 32.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a result, about 20% of base teeth are decayed and 15% of them are in need of root canal treatment [19]. Several studies have reported high success rate of implants -95.4% [20], 95.5% [21] and 97% [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies reported implant success greater than 95% after restoration with single crowns. 1,2,5,6,[10][11][12] Brånemark established the use of extensive surgical flaps to visualize the surgical field during implant surgery. In fact, the elevation of a muco periosteal flap can facilitate implant placement by allowing the surgeon to visually assess bone quantity and morphology at the site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%