Background
Regional anaesthesia may reduce the rate of persistent (chronic) pain
after surgery, a frequent and debilitating condition.
Objectives
To compare local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus
conventional analgesia for the prevention of persistent pain six or 12
months after surgery.
Search methods
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials
(CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 4), PubMed
(1966 to April 2012), EMBASE (1966 to May 2012) and CINAHL (1966 to May
2012) without any language restriction. We used a combination of free text
search and controlled vocabulary search. The results were limited to
randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). We conducted a handsearch in
reference lists of included trials, review articles and conference
abstracts.
Selection criteria
We included RCTs comparing local anaesthetics or regional anaesthesia
versus conventional analgesia with a pain outcome at six or 12 months after
surgery.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data,
including information on adverse events. We contacted study authors for
additional information. Results are presented as pooled odds ratios (OR)
with 95% confidence intervals (CI), based on random-effects models (inverse
variance method). We grouped studies according to surgical interventions. We
employed the Chi2 test and calculated the I2 statistic
to investigate study heterogeneity.
Main results
We identified 23 RCTs studying local anaesthetics or regional
anaesthesia for the prevention of persistent (chronic) pain after surgery.
Data from a total of 1090 patients with outcomes at six months and of 441
patients with outcomes at 12 months were presented. No study included
children. We pooled data from 250 participants after thoracotomy, with
outcomes at six months. Data favoured regional anaesthesia for the
prevention of chronic pain at six months after thoracotomy with an OR of
0.33 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.56). We pooled two studies on paravertebral block for
breast cancer surgery; the pooled data of 89 participants with outcomes at
five to six months favoured paravertebral block with an OR of 0.37 (95% CI
0.14 to 0.94).The methodological quality of the included studies was
intermediate. Adverse effects were not studied systematically and were
reported sparsely. Clinical heterogeneity, attrition and sparse outcome data
hampered the assessment of effects, especially at 12 months.
Authors’ conclusions
Epidural anaesthesia may reduce the risk of developing chronic pain
after thoracotomy in about one patient out of every four patients treated.
Paravertebral block may reduce the risk of chronic pain after breast cancer
surgery in about one out of every five women treated. Our conclusions are
significantly weakened by performance bias, shortcomings in allocation
concealment, considerable attrition and incomplete outcome data. We caution
that our evidence synthesis is based on only a few, small studies. More
studies with high methodological quality, addre...