2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.83.062329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single ion as a shot-noise-limited magnetic-field-gradient probe

Abstract: It is expected that ion trap quantum computing can be made scalable through protocols that make use of transport of ion qubits between sub-regions within the ion trap. In this scenario, any magnetic field inhomogeneity the ion experiences during the transport, may lead to dephasing and loss of fidelity. Here we demonstrate how to measure, and compensate for, magnetic field gradients inside a segmented ion trap, by transporting a single ion over variable distances. We attain a relative magnetic field sensitivit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight additional magnets are placed to compensate for the magnetic field gradient at the ion position. This is done by characterizing the magnetic field homogeneity by measuring the Zeeman splitting at different locations along the trap axis [22], and results in a spatial variation of the Zeeman splitting of less than 2π× 1 kHz in a position range of ± 1 mm around the trapping location. The closest distance of a magnet to a µ-metal wall is about 20 cm, such that no saturation of the µ-metal occurs, which would compromise the shielding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eight additional magnets are placed to compensate for the magnetic field gradient at the ion position. This is done by characterizing the magnetic field homogeneity by measuring the Zeeman splitting at different locations along the trap axis [22], and results in a spatial variation of the Zeeman splitting of less than 2π× 1 kHz in a position range of ± 1 mm around the trapping location. The closest distance of a magnet to a µ-metal wall is about 20 cm, such that no saturation of the µ-metal occurs, which would compromise the shielding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Drifts of the trapped ion position in conjunction with the magnetic field inhomogeneity: By performing Ramsey measurements in combination with ion shuttling [22], we observed a gradient of the Zeeman splitting of about 2π× 8·10 6 Hz/m. Thus, positions drifts from uncontrolled charging of the trap or its thermal expansion might also contribute.…”
Section: Decoherence Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4a is obtained using the carrier transition with and without transport. After a magnetic field gradient compensation has been performed [22], no phase shift between the two data sets is obtained, proving that the Zeeman splitting between the spin energy levels remains constant during the transport. The data in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If one has no a priori knowledge about B 0 one has to average [37] over all possible values of B 0 and one cannot infer the value of G. It is possible to avoid this problem by measuring this expectation value for different positioning {x i } at a fixed probing time t. This strategy has been realized with a single ion moving through a gradient field in Ref. [14]. However, this scheme is definitely a less practical solution as one has to make sure that the initial quantum states are the same, despite the change in the configuration of the chain.…”
Section: B Optimal Measurements For Experimental Realizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different problem is the estimation of the gradient of a spatially distributed magnetic field [10][11][12]. Of course, one may just measure the field at different positions [13] or move a single probe through the field [14,15], and then compute the gradient. But these are not necessarily the optimal strategies, especially in cases where one aims to measure small fluctuations of a large offset field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%