2015
DOI: 10.1039/c4cc10182k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-ion magnet behaviour of heptacoordinated Fe(ii) complexes: on the importance of supramolecular organization

Abstract: Supramolecular organization of a metal complex may significantly contribute to the magnetization dynamics of mononuclear SMMs. This is illustrated for a heptacoordinated Fe(II) complex with rather moderate Ising-type anisotropy for which a slow magnetization relaxation with significant energy barrier was reached when this complex was properly organized in the crystal lattice. Incidentally, it is the first example of single-ion magnet behaviour of Fe(II) in a pentagonal bipyramid surrounding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
64
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The neutral ligand H 4 L binds at the five equatorial positions, leaving the two axial positions free for the two dicyanamide anions, which balanced the charge of the metal center (Figure ). The Fe−N and Fe−O bond lengths (Table S2) are very close to those in other reported heptacoordinated Fe II complexes, further indicating the presence of an Fe II center in all of the studied complexes. The structure of complex 3 resembles those of 1 and 2 , but the axial coordination is somewhat different [axial bond angle 173.3° (N8−Fe−N9), as compared to 179.46° in 1 and 178.2° in 2 ] due to the larger size of the dicyanamide anion (Tables S2 and S3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The neutral ligand H 4 L binds at the five equatorial positions, leaving the two axial positions free for the two dicyanamide anions, which balanced the charge of the metal center (Figure ). The Fe−N and Fe−O bond lengths (Table S2) are very close to those in other reported heptacoordinated Fe II complexes, further indicating the presence of an Fe II center in all of the studied complexes. The structure of complex 3 resembles those of 1 and 2 , but the axial coordination is somewhat different [axial bond angle 173.3° (N8−Fe−N9), as compared to 179.46° in 1 and 178.2° in 2 ] due to the larger size of the dicyanamide anion (Tables S2 and S3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As a consequence, the easy axis of magnetization of the magnetic centers is not parallel to a given direction (Figure S24). The non‐colinear dipolar interaction probably generates a transverse field, which opens the more efficient QTM relaxation pathway, and this may be responsible for the rapid magnetization relaxation in complex 3 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained values of the interatomic distances do not differ from those found in the complex diaqua-(2',2'''-(2,6-pyridinediyldiethylidyne)dioxamohydrazide)-iron(III) perchlorate hydrate [27,28]. In the Cambridge Structural Database 47 hits on structures of compounds of transition metals with ligands of this class are reported [29], mainly manganese or cobalt compounds, only 6 of them being iron compounds [27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of the work that has been reported since then has focused on the development of new chemical systems that exhibit the same property above liquid helium temperatures. Although initial work in this direction involved transition metal clusters, the discovery of SMM behaviour in monometallic complexes-firstly in lanthanides [2,3], but more recently in transition metals [4][5][6]-has caused a shift away from cluster compounds due to the comparative ease with which monometallic systems can be chemically tuned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%