2020
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23987
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single‐molecule detection of cancer mutations using a novel PCR‐LDR‐qPCR assay

Abstract: Detection of low-abundance mutations in cell-free DNA is being used to identify early cancer and early cancer recurrence. Here, we report a new PCR-LDR-qPCR assay capable of detecting point mutations at a single-molecule resolution in the presence of an excess of wild-type DNA. Major features of the assay include selective amplification and detection of mutant DNA employing multiple nested primer-binding regions as well as wild-type sequence blocking oligonucleotides, prevention of carryover contamination, spa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the test involves many washing and incubation steps with a total analysis time of about 2 h [ 48 ]. Compared to the previously reported biosensors for ctDNA detection in real samples ( Table S3 ) [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 ], the advantages of the proposed multi-plex test are related mostly to the cost, run time, and simplicity, as well as the universality and advanced multiplexing potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, the test involves many washing and incubation steps with a total analysis time of about 2 h [ 48 ]. Compared to the previously reported biosensors for ctDNA detection in real samples ( Table S3 ) [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 ], the advantages of the proposed multi-plex test are related mostly to the cost, run time, and simplicity, as well as the universality and advanced multiplexing potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Many researchers combined PCR with LDR for gene identification. For example, Ruiz et al applied this method to establish a specific, rapid, and practical liquid biopsy strategy [ 22 ]. Zhang Xinya et al used this method to detect the D614G mutation in the fragmented coronavirus S gene down to a 40-nt fragment length, which was a shorter template length than that required for the probe method of fluorescent quantitative PCR and had an advantage in detecting fragmented templates [ 23 ].…”
Section: Ligase-related Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a separate article, a similar approach was employed to demonstrate the sensitivity of our PCR-LDR-qPCR assay, designed to interrogate mutations in cfDNA samples. 54 5' CG CA C CG CT CG AT GC GT G GC GA GC TA…”
Section: Single-molecule Detection Of Vim Methylation By Pixel Pcr-ldr-qpcrmentioning
confidence: 99%