2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1102255108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-molecule investigations of the stringent response machinery in living bacterial cells

Abstract: The RelA-mediated stringent response is at the heart of bacterial adaptation to starvation and stress, playing a major role in the bacterial cell cycle and virulence. RelA integrates several environmental cues and synthesizes the alarmone ppGpp, which globally reprograms transcription, translation, and replication. We have developed and implemented novel single-molecule tracking methodology to characterize the intracellular catalytic cycle of RelA. Our single-molecule experiments show that RelA is on the ribos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
298
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(327 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
25
298
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Stringent response has been observed during a lag phase in glucoselactose diauxie of Escherichia coli (11) and carbon starvation in Staphylococcus aureus (12). The stringent response factor RelA produces the phosphorylated purine-derived alarmones (p) ppGpp in response to the presence of uncharged tRNA molecules (13)(14)(15). Stringent response depending on RelA has also been observed in L. lactis (16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Stringent response has been observed during a lag phase in glucoselactose diauxie of Escherichia coli (11) and carbon starvation in Staphylococcus aureus (12). The stringent response factor RelA produces the phosphorylated purine-derived alarmones (p) ppGpp in response to the presence of uncharged tRNA molecules (13)(14)(15). Stringent response depending on RelA has also been observed in L. lactis (16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Especially for smaller tracers, which may cover longer distances within the measurement time, or for techniques allowing for full maps of local diffusivities, it turns out that the diffusion coefficient becomes a function of the local tracer position. For both eukaryotic [8] and prokaryotic [9] cells such local diffusivity maps indeed show significant variations. The motion of tracer particles through space may also be impeded by caging effects when the size of the particle is comparable to the local mesh size in structured environments [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…English et al [28] employed a photoconvertible GFP variant, mEos2, as a reference to study RelA, a ribosome-dependent ( p)ppGpp synthetase, and ribosomes. They obtained an apparent diffusion coefficient for mEos2 of 8-16 mm 2 s -1 depending on the location within the cell.…”
Section: (C) the Cell Cytoplasmmentioning
confidence: 99%