Cellular DNA damage is reversed by balanced repair pathways that avoid accumulation of toxic intermediates. Despite their importance, the organization of DNA repair pathways and the function of repair enzymes in vivo have remained unclear because of the inability to directly observe individual reactions in living cells. Here, we used photoactivation, localization, and tracking in live Escherichia coli to directly visualize single fluorescent labeled DNA polymerase I (Pol) and ligase (Lig) molecules searching for DNA gaps and nicks, performing transient reactions, and releasing their products. Our general approach provides enzymatic rates and copy numbers, substrate-search times, diffusion characteristics, and the spatial distribution of reaction sites, at the single-cell level, all in one measurement. Single repair events last 2.1 s (Pol) and 2.5 s (Lig), respectively. Pol and Lig activities increased fivefold over the basal level within minutes of DNA methylation damage; their rates were limited by upstream base excision repair pathway steps. Pol and Lig spent >80% of their time searching for free substrates, thereby minimizing both the number and lifetime of toxic repair intermediates. We integrated these single-molecule observations to generate a quantitative, systems-level description of a model repair pathway in vivo.single-molecule tracking | super-resolution microscopy | DNA damage response | protein-DNA interaction | cytosolic diffusion A ll cellular organisms rely on complex DNA repair mechanisms for faithful chromosome replication and maintenance of their genome integrity (1). The variety of DNA lesions requires modular repair pathways that carry out damage recognition, damage removal, repair synthesis, and ligation in sequential steps catalyzed by a series of enzymes. However, all repair pathway steps need to be precisely balanced to avoid accumulation of DNA intermediates that are typically more mutagenic and toxic than the original lesion (2). Rapid processing of gapped and nicked intermediates is particularly crucial (3) because they provoke lethal double-strand breaks upon encountering replication forks (4); a single such break can lead to chromosome loss and cell death.Despite extensive genetic, biochemical, and biophysical studies (1), the molecular organization of DNA repair in vivo remains unclear. Most of our mechanistic understanding relies on in vitro ensemble studies, which cannot replicate the cellular environment and stochastic nature of chemical reactions. By avoiding ensembleaveraging, single-molecule experiments have revolutionized the study of protein-DNA interactions in vitro, but extension of these powerful concepts to DNA repair measurements in living cells remains an open goal. Early in vivo work focused on the mean behavior of cell populations and could not examine functionally important heterogeneity, such as the variation in protein copy numbers between cells and over time (5, 6). Such variation can lead to different repair rates across genetically identical cells and may dera...