2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevx.13.021010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Molecule Structure and Topology of Kinetoplast DNA Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4e). We note that even for the control case, the average height is smaller than the one expected for several (possibly tens) of DNA strands overlapping each other at the hub [53] – each around 2 nm thick in the hydrated DNA structure – due to (i) imaging dehydrated DNA and (ii) the compression of the DNA by the AFM tip [36]. Nevertheless, the qualitative and quantitative disruption in the EcoRI treated samples is clear and points to the fact that hubs are mostly made by essential crossings between minicircles rather than maxicircles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4e). We note that even for the control case, the average height is smaller than the one expected for several (possibly tens) of DNA strands overlapping each other at the hub [53] – each around 2 nm thick in the hydrated DNA structure – due to (i) imaging dehydrated DNA and (ii) the compression of the DNA by the AFM tip [36]. Nevertheless, the qualitative and quantitative disruption in the EcoRI treated samples is clear and points to the fact that hubs are mostly made by essential crossings between minicircles rather than maxicircles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then used ImageJ to manually compute the area of each kDNA, distance between hubs and pore size using morphological segmentation via MorphoLibJ [60] as previously described (Ref. [36]). The heights of the hubs in Figure 4e were quantified using Gwyddion software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The key observable for studying the wetting behavior is the contact angle θ given by Young's equation 114 (44) where γ sv , γ sl , and γ lv are the interfacial tensions between the solid and the "vapor" phase, between the solid and the "liquid" phase, and between "liquid" and "vapor" phases. In order to calculate the two solid−fluid tensions, one sets the boundary condition far away from the wall to the corresponding bulk densities and computes the inhomogeneous density profiles ρ i (z) from DFT as described above.…”
Section: Correlations and Response Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%