The Neuronal Codes of the Cerebellum 2016
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-801386-1.00011-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Neuron and Network Computation in Realistic Models of the Cerebellar Cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The features used as templates were extracted from GrC spike discharges under the assumption that these contain all the information required to optimize G i-max values. The present models can be defined “realistic” as far as they reflect a modeling strategy that implements neuronal membranes with biophysically-detailed mechanisms (see discussion in De Schutter, 2001 ; Santamaria et al, 2007 ; D'Angelo et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The features used as templates were extracted from GrC spike discharges under the assumption that these contain all the information required to optimize G i-max values. The present models can be defined “realistic” as far as they reflect a modeling strategy that implements neuronal membranes with biophysically-detailed mechanisms (see discussion in De Schutter, 2001 ; Santamaria et al, 2007 ; D'Angelo et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties emerge from the specific ionic channel complement and involve differentially the soma, dendrites and axons. For most of these neurons, there are advanced Hodgkin-Huxley style models, which have helped understanding how the specific electroresponsive properties are generated and as noted above, have set landmarks for realistic modeling strategy (for an extended review see D’Angelo et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Critical Dynamic Properties Of the Cerebellar Microcircuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent realistic computational models of the cerebellum have been built using an extensive amount of information taken from the anatomical and physiological literature and incorporate neuronal and synaptic models capable of responding to arbitrary input patterns and of generating multiple response properties (Maex and De Schutter, 1998 ; Medina et al, 2000 ; Santamaria et al, 2002 , 2007 ; Santamaria and Bower, 2005 ; Solinas et al, 2010 ; Kennedy et al, 2014 ). Each neuron model is carefully reconstructed through repeated validation steps at different levels: at present, accurate models of the GrCs, GoCs, UBCs, PCs, DCN neurons and IOs neurons are available (De Schutter and Bower, 1994a , b ; D’Angelo et al, 2001 ; D’Angelo et al, 2016 ; Nieus et al, 2006 , 2014 ; Solinas et al, 2007a , b ; Vervaeke et al, 2010 ; Luthman et al, 2011 ; Steuber et al, 2011 ; De Gruijl et al, 2012 ; Subramaniyam et al, 2014 ; Masoli et al, 2015 ). Clearly, realistic models have the intrinsic capacity to resolve the still poorly understood issue of brain dynamics, an issue critical to understand how the cerebellum operates (for e.g., see Llinás, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%