2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray–based concurrent screening of 24-chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human embryos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
82
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…37,38 Array comparative genomic hybridisation and single nucleotide polymorphism microarray provide copy number information for every other chromosome in addition to those involved in the chromosome rearrangement. [39][40][41][42] However, these findings will reduce the number of embryos available for transfer by detecting abnormalities, which may not persist during embryo development, or may be clinically insignificant. The data we present here demonstrate that reciprocal translocation couples are likely to have relatively few normal/balanced embryos; rejecting embryos with apparent 30 Keymolen et al 31 Ko et al 24 Harper et al 6 Outcome measure per cycle Calculated % (95% CI) Calculated % (95% CI) Calculated % (95% CI) Calculated % (95% CI) Calculated % (95% CI)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,38 Array comparative genomic hybridisation and single nucleotide polymorphism microarray provide copy number information for every other chromosome in addition to those involved in the chromosome rearrangement. [39][40][41][42] However, these findings will reduce the number of embryos available for transfer by detecting abnormalities, which may not persist during embryo development, or may be clinically insignificant. The data we present here demonstrate that reciprocal translocation couples are likely to have relatively few normal/balanced embryos; rejecting embryos with apparent 30 Keymolen et al 31 Ko et al 24 Harper et al 6 Outcome measure per cycle Calculated % (95% CI) Calculated % (95% CI) Calculated % (95% CI) Calculated % (95% CI) Calculated % (95% CI)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The embryonic DNA is amplified by whole genome amplification and then tested by chromosome microarray analysis to distinguish balanced from unbalanced embryos. Successful application of these diagnostic technologies on a large number of patient embryos has resulted in increased implantation, pregnancy and live birth rates, and importantly, lower miscarriage rates [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, in those embryos that are diagnosed as balanced, there is the possibility of additional incidental aneuploidies, including whole or partial chromosomal gains and losses, mosaicism, and segmental imbalances in other chromosomes that are known to commonly arise by either non-disjunction errors [15] or breakage-fusion-bridge cycles [16]. So far, the technology developed for PGD of translocations has primarily focused on the detection of unbalanced chromosome derivatives and incidental whole or partial chromosomal aneuploidies using 24-chromosome testing either by chromosome microarray analysis [11,12] or next-generation sequencing (NGS) [13,[17][18][19][20]. We speculated that a higherresolution technology with the capacity to additionally detect more subtle chromosomal abnormalities might further benefit patients undertaking PGD cycles for translocations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (Conn et al 1998, Van Assche et al 1999, Coonen et al 2000, Alves et al 2002, Otani et al 2006, Bernicot et al 2010, Bernicot et al 2012, Ko et al 2013 and microarray-based profiling , Fiorentino et al 2011, Treff et al 2011, van Uum et al 2012, Huang et al 2013, Tan et al 2013 are widely used to select normal/balanced embryos for CR carriers to transfer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, PGD based on cleavage-stage FISH for CR carriers may not accurately detect the imbalance of CR-associated chromosomes and effectively reflect the chromosomal composition in the corresponding blastocysts. Moreover, aneuploidy is common in embryos from CR carriers (Pujol et al 2003), even those that are normal/balanced for CR-associated chromosomes (Pujol et al 2006, Treff et al 2011, and CR-associated chromosomes can exert inter-chromosomal effects during meiosis and mitosis (Lejeune 1963, Pellestor et al 1989, Conn et al 1998, Munne et al 2005a, leading to an increased risk of chromosomal abnormality. As such, aneuploidy screening is recommended in parallel with the detection of CR-associated imbalances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%