1989
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.58.3666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Particle and Magnetic Excitation Spectra of Degenerate Anderson Model with FiniteffCoulomb Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
144
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is one state with excitation energy E ex → 0 for N → ∞ but its matrix element with the ground state vanishes as N → ∞. In order to obtain the full frequency dependence of the spectral function within the NRG, it is necessary to combine the information of all iteration steps as in each iteration the results are only given for a certain frequency range (see also [16,17]). …”
Section: Results For the Spectral Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is one state with excitation energy E ex → 0 for N → ∞ but its matrix element with the ground state vanishes as N → ∞. In order to obtain the full frequency dependence of the spectral function within the NRG, it is necessary to combine the information of all iteration steps as in each iteration the results are only given for a certain frequency range (see also [16,17]). …”
Section: Results For the Spectral Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us first describe the procedure for calculating the T = 0 spectral function [20,30]. The diagonalization of the clusters N = 0, 1, 2, .…”
Section: B Finite Temperature Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work builds on Wilson's numerical renormalization group (NRG) method [1]. Wilson discretized the environmental spectrum on a logarithmic grid of energies Λ −n , (with Λ > 1, 1 ≤ n ≤ N → ∞), with exponentially high resolution of low-energy excitations, and mapped the impurity model onto a "Wilson tight-binding chain", with hopping matrix elements that decrease exponentially as Λ −n/2 with site index n. Because of this separation of energy scales, the Hamiltonian can be diagonalized iteratively: adding one site at a time, a new "shell" of eigenstates is constructed from the new site's states and the M K lowest-lying eigenstates of the previous shell (the so-called "kept" states), while "discarding" the rest.Subsequent authors [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] have shown that spectral functions such as A BC (ω) can be calculated via the Lehmann sum, using NRG states (kept and discarded) of those shells n for which ω ∼ Λ −n/2 . Though plausible on heuristic grounds, this strategy entails double-counting ambiguities [5] about how to combine data from successive shells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%